IBTF vs. USFR
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF (IBTF) and WisdomTree Bloomberg Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR).
IBTF and USFR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IBTF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the ICE 2025 Maturity US Treasury Index. It was launched on Feb 25, 2020. USFR is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. It was launched on Feb 4, 2014. Both IBTF and USFR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IBTF or USFR.
Correlation
The correlation between IBTF and USFR is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
IBTF vs. USFR - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
IBTF:
5.85
USFR:
16.74
IBTF:
10.82
USFR:
56.40
IBTF:
2.67
USFR:
14.60
IBTF:
0.98
USFR:
88.29
IBTF:
100.55
USFR:
771.37
IBTF:
0.05%
USFR:
0.01%
IBTF:
0.86%
USFR:
0.31%
IBTF:
-10.45%
USFR:
-1.36%
IBTF:
-0.34%
USFR:
0.00%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IBTF achieves a 0.49% return, which is significantly lower than USFR's 0.66% return.
IBTF
0.49%
0.36%
2.29%
5.07%
N/A
N/A
USFR
0.66%
0.38%
2.51%
5.23%
2.67%
2.50%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IBTF vs. USFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
IBTF has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than USFR's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IBTF vs. USFR — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
IBTF
USFR
IBTF vs. USFR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF (IBTF) and WisdomTree Bloomberg Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IBTF vs. USFR - Dividend Comparison
IBTF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.32%, less than USFR's 5.04% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBTF iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF | 4.32% | 4.31% | 4.03% | 1.92% | 0.57% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USFR WisdomTree Bloomberg Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 5.04% | 5.17% | 5.12% | 1.78% | 0.01% | 0.40% | 2.08% | 1.67% | 1.04% | 0.29% |
Drawdowns
IBTF vs. USFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBTF drawdown since its inception was -10.45%, which is greater than USFR's maximum drawdown of -1.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTF and USFR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IBTF vs. USFR - Volatility Comparison
iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF (IBTF) has a higher volatility of 0.21% compared to WisdomTree Bloomberg Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR) at 0.07%. This indicates that IBTF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.