VTES vs. ZMUN
VTES (Vanguard Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF Shares) and ZMUN (F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds - VTES tracks the S&P 0-7 Yr National AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index - Benchmark TR Gross while ZMUN tracks the Bloomberg Municipal Bond Currently Callable Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VTES charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for ZMUN.
Performance
VTES vs. ZMUN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTES achieves a 0.65% return, which is significantly lower than ZMUN's 1.59% return.
VTES
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 0.65%
- 6M
- 1.08%
- 1Y
- 3.72%
- 3Y*
- 3.22%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZMUN
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 1.59%
- 6M
- 1.90%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VTES vs. ZMUN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VTES Vanguard Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF Shares | 0.65% | 0.58% |
ZMUN F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF | 1.59% | 0.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTES and ZMUN is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | 0.24 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTES vs. ZMUN — Risk / Return Rank
VTES
ZMUN
VTES vs. ZMUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF Shares (VTES) and F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF (ZMUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VTES | ZMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.01 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.36 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.71 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.54 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.58 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VTES | ZMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.01 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.81 | 6.55 | -4.74 |
Drawdowns
VTES vs. ZMUN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTES drawdown since its inception was -2.42%, which is greater than ZMUN's maximum drawdown of -0.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTES and ZMUN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTES | ZMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.42% | -0.09% | -2.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.47% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.63% | 0.00% | -0.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.50% | -0.01% | -0.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.49% | — | — |
Volatility
VTES vs. ZMUN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTES | ZMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.35% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.97% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.24% | 0.54% | +0.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.72% | 0.54% | +1.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.72% | 0.54% | +1.18% |
VTES vs. ZMUN - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTES has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than ZMUN's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
VTES vs. ZMUN - Dividend Comparison
VTES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, more than ZMUN's 2.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
VTES Vanguard Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF Shares | 2.75% | 2.77% | 2.99% | 2.03% |
ZMUN F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF | 2.28% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VTES and ZMUN have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VTES is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VTES is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ZMUN.
VTES has the higher dividend yield at 2.75%, compared with 2.28% for ZMUN.
VTES tracks S&P 0-7 Yr National AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while ZMUN tracks Bloomberg Municipal Bond Currently Callable Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and F/m Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VTES and 0.30% for ZMUN.
Find the right allocation for VTES and ZMUN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer