VTES vs. GUMI
VTES (Vanguard Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF Shares) and GUMI (Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. VTES is passively managed, while GUMI is actively managed. Over the past year, VTES returned 3.63% vs 3.18% for GUMI. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VTES charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for GUMI.
Performance
VTES vs. GUMI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTES achieves a 0.66% return, which is significantly lower than GUMI's 1.06% return.
VTES
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 0.66%
- 6M
- 1.02%
- 1Y
- 3.63%
- 3Y*
- 3.23%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GUMI
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 1.06%
- 6M
- 1.20%
- 1Y
- 3.18%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VTES vs. GUMI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
VTES Vanguard Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF Shares | 0.66% | 4.19% | 1.29% |
GUMI Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF | 1.06% | 3.39% | 1.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTES and GUMI is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2024 | 0.27 |
The correlation between VTES and GUMI shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTES vs. GUMI — Risk / Return Rank
VTES
GUMI
VTES vs. GUMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF Shares (VTES) and Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF (GUMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VTES | GUMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.70 | 1.64 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.48 | 8.93 | -6.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.36 | 37.83 | -30.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VTES | GUMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.94 | 2.92 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.81 | 3.29 | -1.48 |
Drawdowns
VTES vs. GUMI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTES drawdown since its inception was -2.42%, which is greater than GUMI's maximum drawdown of -0.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTES and GUMI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTES | GUMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.42% | -0.48% | -1.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.47% | -0.36% | -1.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.62% | -0.04% | -0.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.50% | -0.05% | -0.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.49% | 0.08% | +0.41% |
Volatility
VTES vs. GUMI - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF Shares (VTES) has a higher volatility of 0.35% compared to Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF (GUMI) at 0.25%. This indicates that VTES's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GUMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTES | GUMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.35% | 0.25% | +0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.97% | 0.55% | +0.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.24% | 1.09% | +0.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.72% | 0.99% | +0.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.72% | 0.99% | +0.73% |
VTES vs. GUMI - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTES has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than GUMI's 0.16% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VTES vs. GUMI - Dividend Comparison
VTES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, which matches GUMI's 2.77% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GUMI Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF | 2.77% | 2.95% | 1.37% | 0.00% |
VTES Vanguard Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF Shares | 2.75% | 2.77% | 2.99% | 2.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VTES and GUMI have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VTES has higher volatility (0.35%) compared to GUMI (0.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTES dropped -2.42% vs GUMI's -0.48%.
On 1-year performance, VTES leads with 3.63% vs 3.18% for GUMI. On fees, VTES is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, GUMI has been the lower-risk option at 0.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, VTES has performed better with a 3.63% return vs 3.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTES is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.16% for GUMI.
GUMI has the higher dividend yield at 2.77%, compared with 2.75% for VTES.
They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VTES and 0.16% for GUMI.
VTES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 2.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VTES and GUMI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer