VTEL vs. ZMUN
VTEL (Vanguard Long-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF) and ZMUN (F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds - VTEL tracks the S&P 10+ Year National AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index while ZMUN tracks the Bloomberg Municipal Bond Currently Callable Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VTEL charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for ZMUN.
Performance
VTEL vs. ZMUN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTEL achieves a 1.88% return, which is significantly higher than ZMUN's 1.59% return.
VTEL
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- 1.88%
- 6M
- 2.25%
- 1Y
- 8.64%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZMUN
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 1.59%
- 6M
- 1.90%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VTEL vs. ZMUN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VTEL Vanguard Long-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 1.88% | 2.01% |
ZMUN F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF | 1.59% | 0.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTEL and ZMUN is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | 0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTEL vs. ZMUN — Risk / Return Rank
VTEL
ZMUN
VTEL vs. ZMUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Long-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VTEL) and F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF (ZMUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VTEL | ZMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.32 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.49 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.58 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.23 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VTEL | ZMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.32 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.26 | 6.55 | -4.30 |
Drawdowns
VTEL vs. ZMUN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTEL drawdown since its inception was -3.22%, which is greater than ZMUN's maximum drawdown of -0.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTEL and ZMUN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTEL | ZMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.22% | -0.09% | -3.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.22% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.19% | 0.00% | -0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.59% | -0.01% | -0.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.90% | — | — |
Volatility
VTEL vs. ZMUN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTEL | ZMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.26% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.64% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.75% | 0.54% | +3.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.77% | 0.54% | +3.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.77% | 0.54% | +3.23% |
VTEL vs. ZMUN - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTEL has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than ZMUN's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
VTEL vs. ZMUN - Dividend Comparison
VTEL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, more than ZMUN's 2.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
VTEL Vanguard Long-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 3.81% | 2.23% |
ZMUN F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF | 2.28% | 0.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VTEL and ZMUN have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VTEL is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VTEL is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ZMUN.
VTEL has the higher dividend yield at 3.81%, compared with 2.28% for ZMUN.
VTEL tracks S&P 10+ Year National AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index, while ZMUN tracks Bloomberg Municipal Bond Currently Callable Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and F/m Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VTEL and 0.30% for ZMUN.
Find the right allocation for VTEL and ZMUN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer