PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTEL vs. RMCA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTEL vs. RMCA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Long-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VTEL) and Rockefeller California Municipal Bond ETF (RMCA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTEL achieves a 2.14% return, which is significantly lower than RMCA's 2.75% return.


VTEL

1D
-0.07%
1M
1.82%
YTD
2.14%
6M
2.27%
1Y
8.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RMCA

1D
-0.12%
1M
1.62%
YTD
2.75%
6M
2.99%
1Y
7.24%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTEL vs. RMCA - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between VTEL and RMCA is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2025

0.84

The correlation between VTEL and RMCA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTEL vs. RMCA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTEL
VTEL Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
VTEL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTEL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTEL Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
VTEL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTEL Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

RMCA
RMCA Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
RMCA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMCA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMCA Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
RMCA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMCA Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTEL vs. RMCA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Long-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VTEL) and Rockefeller California Municipal Bond ETF (RMCA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VTELRMCADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.43

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

3.10

-0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.14

10.31

-1.16

VTEL vs. RMCA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTEL Sharpe Ratio is 2.23, which is comparable to the RMCA Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTEL and RMCA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VTEL vs. RMCA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTEL drawdown since its inception was -3.22%, smaller than the maximum RMCA drawdown of -5.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTEL and RMCA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTELRMCADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.22%

-5.95%

+2.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.22%

-2.35%

-0.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.12%

-0.12%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.57%

-1.59%

+1.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.90%

0.70%

+0.20%

Volatility

VTEL vs. RMCA - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Long-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VTEL) has a higher volatility of 0.98% compared to Rockefeller California Municipal Bond ETF (RMCA) at 0.88%. This indicates that VTEL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RMCA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTELRMCADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.98%

0.88%

+0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.67%

2.48%

+0.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.71%

3.62%

+0.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.73%

5.32%

-1.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.73%

5.32%

-1.59%

VTEL vs. RMCA - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTEL has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than RMCA's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

VTEL vs. RMCA - Dividend Comparison

VTEL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.80%, less than RMCA's 4.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
RMCA
Rockefeller California Municipal Bond ETF
4.34%4.51%1.20%
VTEL
Vanguard Long-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF
3.80%2.23%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VTEL and RMCA have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTEL has higher volatility (0.98%) compared to RMCA (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTEL dropped -3.22% vs RMCA's -5.95%.

On 1-year performance, VTEL leads with 8.23% vs 7.24% for RMCA. On fees, VTEL is cheaper at 0.09% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, VTEL has performed better with a 8.23% return vs 7.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTEL is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for RMCA.

RMCA has the higher dividend yield at 4.34%, compared with 3.80% for VTEL.

They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Rockefeller. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VTEL and 0.55% for RMCA.

VTEL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTEL and RMCA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer