VTEC vs. BPH
VTEC (Vanguard California Tax-Exempt Bond ETF) and BPH (BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VTEC is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the S&P California AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index, while BPH is a Oil & Gas fund actively managed by Precidian. VTEC is passively managed, while BPH is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.77, they often move in opposite directions. VTEC charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for BPH.
Performance
VTEC vs. BPH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
VTEC
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- YTD
- 0.98%
- 6M
- 1.25%
- 1Y
- 6.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BPH
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VTEC vs. BPH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
VTEC Vanguard California Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 0.72% |
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF | 2.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTEC and BPH is -0.77, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2026 | -0.77 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTEC vs. BPH — Risk / Return Rank
VTEC
BPH
VTEC vs. BPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard California Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VTEC) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VTEC | BPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.35 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.83 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VTEC | BPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.39 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.73 | 9.48 | -8.75 |
Drawdowns
VTEC vs. BPH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTEC drawdown since its inception was -4.50%, which is greater than BPH's maximum drawdown of -2.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTEC and BPH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTEC | BPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.50% | -2.35% | -2.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.82% | 0.00% | -0.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.12% | -1.08% | -0.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.86% | — | — |
Volatility
VTEC vs. BPH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTEC | BPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.86% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.87% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.82% | 25.75% | -22.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.76% | 25.75% | -21.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.76% | 25.75% | -21.99% |
VTEC vs. BPH - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTEC has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than BPH's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VTEC vs. BPH - Dividend Comparison
VTEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%, while BPH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTEC Vanguard California Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 3.16% | 3.13% | 2.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VTEC and BPH have a correlation of -0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VTEC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VTEC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for BPH.
VTEC has the higher dividend yield at 3.16%, compared with 0.00% for BPH.
VTEC is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while BPH is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for VTEC and 0.19% for BPH.
Find the right allocation for VTEC and BPH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer