PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTBIX vs. FSHBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTBIX vs. FSHBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total Bond Market II Index Fund Investor Shares (VTBIX) and Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund (FSHBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, VTBIX has underperformed FSHBX with an annualized return of 1.30%, while FSHBX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.11% annualized return.


VTBIX

1D
0.21%
1M
-0.40%
6M
-0.10%
YTD
-0.00%
1Y
4.16%
3Y*
3.72%
5Y*
-0.35%
10Y*
1.30%

FSHBX

1D
0.12%
1M
0.21%
6M
0.89%
YTD
0.77%
1Y
3.47%
3Y*
4.81%
5Y*
2.29%
10Y*
2.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTBIX vs. FSHBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VTBIX
Vanguard Total Bond Market II Index Fund Investor Shares
-0.00%7.11%1.25%5.03%-13.18%-1.88%7.47%8.62%-0.32%3.53%
FSHBX
Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund
0.77%5.49%4.73%5.35%-3.86%-0.92%3.59%4.20%1.21%1.16%

Correlation

The correlation between VTBIX and FSHBX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2012

0.67

The correlation between VTBIX and FSHBX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTBIX vs. FSHBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTBIX
VTBIX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
VTBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
VTBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

FSHBX
FSHBX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
FSHBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSHBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSHBX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
FSHBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSHBX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTBIX vs. FSHBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Bond Market II Index Fund Investor Shares (VTBIX) and Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund (FSHBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VTBIXFSHBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.46

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.51

3.08

-1.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.06

11.71

-7.65

VTBIX vs. FSHBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTBIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is lower than the FSHBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTBIX and FSHBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VTBIX vs. FSHBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTBIX drawdown since its inception was -18.72%, which is greater than FSHBX's maximum drawdown of -8.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTBIX and FSHBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTBIXFSHBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.72%

-8.80%

-9.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.84%

-1.17%

-1.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.98%

-1.17%

-4.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.11%

-6.36%

-11.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.72%

-6.51%

-12.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.28%

-0.12%

-3.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.41%

-1.04%

-3.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.05%

0.31%

+0.74%

Volatility

VTBIX vs. FSHBX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Total Bond Market II Index Fund Investor Shares (VTBIX) has a higher volatility of 1.01% compared to Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund (FSHBX) at 0.50%. This indicates that VTBIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSHBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTBIXFSHBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.01%

0.50%

+0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.93%

1.45%

+1.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.78%

1.92%

+1.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.95%

2.22%

+3.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.92%

1.86%

+3.06%

VTBIX vs. FSHBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTBIX has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than FSHBX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

VTBIX vs. FSHBX - Dividend Comparison

VTBIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%, less than FSHBX's 4.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSHBX
Fidelity Short-Term Bond Fund
4.15%4.26%4.00%3.00%0.83%1.04%2.62%2.13%1.78%1.27%1.12%0.88%
VTBIX
Vanguard Total Bond Market II Index Fund Investor Shares
4.02%3.88%3.70%2.53%2.47%1.75%3.20%2.72%2.51%2.43%2.48%2.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


VTBIX and FSHBX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTBIX has higher volatility (1.01%) compared to FSHBX (0.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTBIX dropped -18.72% vs FSHBX's -8.80%.

FSHBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTBIX and FSHBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer