VT vs. XAR
VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) and XAR (SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index, while XAR is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VT returned 12.93%/yr vs 18.45%/yr for XAR. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VT charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XAR.
Performance
VT vs. XAR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VT achieves a 11.06% return, which is significantly lower than XAR's 16.10% return. Over the past 10 years, VT has underperformed XAR with an annualized return of 12.93%, while XAR has yielded a comparatively higher 18.45% annualized return.
VT
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 1.80%
- YTD
- 11.06%
- 6M
- 11.82%
- 1Y
- 27.43%
- 3Y*
- 19.71%
- 5Y*
- 10.65%
- 10Y*
- 12.93%
XAR
- 1D
- -1.55%
- 1M
- 7.38%
- YTD
- 16.10%
- 6M
- 18.39%
- 1Y
- 42.07%
- 3Y*
- 33.32%
- 5Y*
- 16.58%
- 10Y*
- 18.45%
VT vs. XAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 11.06% | 22.43% | 16.49% | 22.02% | -18.00% | 18.27% | 16.59% | 26.81% | -9.76% | 24.50% |
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 16.10% | 46.15% | 23.32% | 23.79% | -5.02% | 2.31% | 6.18% | 39.33% | -4.58% | 33.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between VT and XAR is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2011 | 0.68 |
The correlation between VT and XAR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
VT vs. XAR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VT
XAR
Technology
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
VT
XAR
Financial Services
VT
XAR
-
Industrials
VT
XAR
Consumer Cyclical
VT
XAR
-
Communication Services
VT
XAR
-
Healthcare
VT
XAR
-
Consumer Defensive
VT
XAR
-
Energy
VT
XAR
-
Basic Materials
VT
XAR
-
Utilities
VT
XAR
-
Real Estate
VT
XAR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VT vs. XAR — Risk / Return Rank
VT
XAR
VT vs. XAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VT | XAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.25 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.68 | 2.43 | +0.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.67 | 6.81 | +4.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VT vs. XAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VT drawdown since its inception was -50.27%, which is greater than XAR's maximum drawdown of -46.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VT and XAR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VT | XAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.27% | -46.37% | -3.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.67% | -17.22% | +7.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.51% | -19.73% | +3.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.38% | -32.40% | +6.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.24% | -46.37% | +12.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.92% | -4.32% | +2.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.01% | -6.78% | -0.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.22% | 6.13% | -3.91% |
Volatility
VT vs. XAR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) is 5.26%, while SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF (XAR) has a volatility of 11.46%. This indicates that VT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VT | XAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.26% | 11.46% | -6.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.01% | 23.56% | -12.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.38% | 27.85% | -14.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.15% | 23.66% | -7.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.27% | 24.74% | -7.47% |
VT vs. XAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
VT has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than XAR's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
VT vs. XAR - Dividend Comparison
VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, more than XAR's 0.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.61% | 1.82% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
XAR SPDR S&P Aerospace & Defense ETF | 0.31% | 0.40% | 0.66% | 0.54% | 0.50% | 0.83% | 0.63% | 0.75% | 1.19% | 0.76% | 1.09% | 2.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VT and XAR have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XAR has higher volatility (11.46%) compared to VT (5.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VT dropped -50.27% vs XAR's -46.37%.
On 10-year performance, XAR leads with 18.45% vs 12.93% for VT. On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VT has been the lower-risk option at 5.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XAR has performed better with a 18.45% return vs 12.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XAR.
VT has the higher dividend yield at 1.61%, compared with 0.31% for XAR.
VT is categorized as Global Equities, while XAR is Aerospace & Defense. VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index, while XAR tracks S&P Aerospace & Defense Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VT and 0.35% for XAR.
VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VT and XAR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer