VT vs. WNTR

Last updated Jul 31, 2026

VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) and WNTR (YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index, while WNTR is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. VT is passively managed, while WNTR is actively managed. Over the past year, VT returned 21.10% vs 105.56% for WNTR. Their -0.48 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. VT charges 0.06%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for WNTR.

Performance

VT vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VT achieves a 10.86% return, which is significantly higher than WNTR's 7.26% return.

VT

• 1D: 2.12%
• 1M: -0.96%
• 6M: 6.58%
• YTD: 10.86%
• 1Y: 21.10%
• 3Y*: 17.85%
• 5Y*: 10.52%
• 10Y*: 12.29%
• ALL TIME*: 8.80%

WNTR

• 1D: -3.26%
• 1M: -6.64%
• 6M: 6.58%
• YTD: 7.26%
• 1Y: 105.56%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 44.51%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	$412.83M	$369.31M	$481.45M
WNTR YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF	$3.65M	$4.06M	$3.91M

VT vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	10.86%	21.48%
WNTR YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF	7.26%	52.78%

Correlation

The correlation between VT and WNTR is -0.48, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025	-0.48

Return for Risk

VT vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VT

VT Risk / Return Rank: 70
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 68
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 76

WNTR

WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 72
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 75
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VT vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VT	WNTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	1.94	-0.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.14	2.25	-0.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.30	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.19	2.49	-0.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.13	6.30	+2.82

VT vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VT Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the WNTR Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VT and WNTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VT vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VT drawdown since its inception was -50.27%, which is greater than WNTR's maximum drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VT and WNTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	VT	WNTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.27%	-42.65%	-7.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.67%	-42.65%	+32.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.51%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.38%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.24%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.10%	-12.49%	+10.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.97%	-20.21%	+13.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.32%	16.80%	-14.48%

Volatility

VT vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) is 4.01%, while YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) has a volatility of 15.17%. This indicates that VT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VT	WNTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.01%	15.17%	-11.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.68%	47.68%	-36.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.97%	54.60%	-40.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.22%	53.43%	-37.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.18%	53.43%	-36.25%

VT vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

VT has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

VT vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, less than WNTR's 116.85% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	1.60%	1.82%	1.95%	2.08%	2.20%	1.82%	1.66%	2.32%	2.53%	2.11%	2.39%	2.45%
WNTR YieldMax MSTR Short Option Income Strategy ETF	116.85%	58.56%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VT and WNTR in my portfolio?

VT and WNTR have a correlation of -0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VT or WNTR?

WNTR has higher volatility (15.17%) compared to VT (4.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VT dropped -50.27% vs WNTR's -42.65%.

Which ETF is better, VT or WNTR?

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 105.56% vs 21.10% for VT. On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VT has been the lower-risk option at 4.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VT or WNTR?

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 105.56% return vs 21.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VT or WNTR?

VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for WNTR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VT or WNTR?

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 116.85%, compared with 1.60% for VT.

What is the main difference between VT and WNTR?

VT is categorized as Global Equities, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VT and 1.00% for WNTR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WNTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.