PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VT vs. VDC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VT vs. VDC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VT achieves a 12.78% return, which is significantly higher than VDC's 10.18% return. Over the past 10 years, VT has outperformed VDC with an annualized return of 13.03%, while VDC has yielded a comparatively lower 7.99% annualized return.


VT

1D
1.55%
1M
3.39%
YTD
12.78%
6M
13.56%
1Y
29.41%
3Y*
19.92%
5Y*
11.15%
10Y*
13.03%

VDC

1D
-0.33%
1M
0.10%
YTD
10.18%
6M
8.00%
1Y
8.20%
3Y*
8.39%
5Y*
7.45%
10Y*
7.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VT vs. VDC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
12.78%22.43%16.49%22.02%-18.00%18.27%16.59%26.81%-9.76%24.50%
VDC
Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF
10.18%2.17%13.30%2.38%-1.79%17.64%10.86%26.11%-7.79%11.85%

Correlation

The correlation between VT and VDC is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2008

0.63

Over the past year, the correlation between VT and VDC has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VT vs. VDC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VT
VDC

Technology

27.8%

-

Financial Services

15.9%

-

Industrials

12.0%
0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
1.8%

Communication Services

8.3%

-

Healthcare

8.1%
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
97.5%

Energy

4.3%

-

Basic Materials

4.2%
0.3%

Utilities

2.7%

-

Real Estate

2.4%

-

Technology

VT
27.8%
VDC

-

Financial Services

VT
15.9%
VDC

-

Industrials

VT
12.0%
VDC
0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

VT
9.5%
VDC
1.8%

Communication Services

VT
8.3%
VDC

-

Healthcare

VT
8.1%
VDC
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

VT
4.8%
VDC
97.5%

Energy

VT
4.3%
VDC

-

Basic Materials

VT
4.2%
VDC
0.3%

Utilities

VT
2.7%
VDC

-

Real Estate

VT
2.4%
VDC

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VT vs. VDC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VT
VT Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

VDC
VDC Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
VDC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VDC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
VDC Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
VDC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
VDC Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VT vs. VDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VTVDCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.12

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.05

0.89

+2.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.29

1.80

+11.49

VT vs. VDC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VT Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is higher than the VDC Sharpe Ratio of 0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VT and VDC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VT vs. VDC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VT drawdown since its inception was -50.27%, which is greater than VDC's maximum drawdown of -34.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VT and VDC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTVDCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.27%

-34.24%

-16.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.67%

-9.28%

-0.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.51%

-11.78%

-4.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.38%

-16.55%

-9.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.24%

-25.31%

-8.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.40%

-4.68%

+4.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.01%

-3.73%

-3.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.22%

4.58%

-2.36%

Volatility

VT vs. VDC - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) has a higher volatility of 5.46% compared to Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF (VDC) at 4.63%. This indicates that VT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTVDCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.46%

4.63%

+0.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.11%

10.00%

+1.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.41%

12.53%

+0.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.17%

13.18%

+2.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.28%

14.66%

+2.62%

VT vs. VDC - Expense Ratio Comparison

VT has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than VDC's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VT vs. VDC - Dividend Comparison

VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, less than VDC's 2.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VDC
Vanguard Consumer Staples ETF
2.08%2.26%2.33%2.65%2.37%2.14%2.50%2.44%2.78%2.52%2.39%2.55%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
1.58%1.82%1.95%2.08%2.20%1.82%1.66%2.32%2.53%2.11%2.39%2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


VT and VDC have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VT has higher volatility (5.46%) compared to VDC (4.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VT dropped -50.27% vs VDC's -34.24%.

On 10-year performance, VT leads with 13.03% vs 7.99% for VDC. On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VDC has been the lower-risk option at 4.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VT has performed better with a 13.03% return vs 7.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VDC.

VDC has the higher dividend yield at 2.08%, compared with 1.58% for VT.

VT is categorized as Global Equities, while VDC is Consumer Staples Equities. VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index, while VDC tracks MSCI US Investable Market Consumer Staples 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VT and 0.09% for VDC.

VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VT and VDC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer