VT vs. TDIV
VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) and TDIV (First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index, while TDIV is a Technology Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VT returned 12.93%/yr vs 18.57%/yr for TDIV. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VT charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for TDIV.
Performance
VT vs. TDIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VT achieves a 11.06% return, which is significantly lower than TDIV's 21.17% return. Over the past 10 years, VT has underperformed TDIV with an annualized return of 12.93%, while TDIV has yielded a comparatively higher 18.57% annualized return.
VT
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- YTD
- 11.06%
- 6M
- 11.82%
- 1Y
- 25.83%
- 3Y*
- 19.71%
- 5Y*
- 10.65%
- 10Y*
- 12.93%
TDIV
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- 4.78%
- YTD
- 21.17%
- 6M
- 20.34%
- 1Y
- 36.48%
- 3Y*
- 28.42%
- 5Y*
- 17.37%
- 10Y*
- 18.57%
VT vs. TDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 11.06% | 22.43% | 16.49% | 22.02% | -18.00% | 18.27% | 16.59% | 26.81% | -9.76% | 24.50% |
TDIV First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund | 21.17% | 25.27% | 24.43% | 36.71% | -22.13% | 29.49% | 17.55% | 33.27% | -3.18% | 21.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between VT and TDIV is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2012 | 0.86 |
The correlation between VT and TDIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
VT vs. TDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VT
TDIV
Technology
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
VT
TDIV
Financial Services
VT
TDIV
-
Industrials
VT
TDIV
Consumer Cyclical
VT
TDIV
-
Communication Services
VT
TDIV
Healthcare
VT
TDIV
-
Consumer Defensive
VT
TDIV
-
Energy
VT
TDIV
-
Basic Materials
VT
TDIV
-
Utilities
VT
TDIV
-
Real Estate
VT
TDIV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VT vs. TDIV — Risk / Return Rank
VT
TDIV
VT vs. TDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VT | TDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.32 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.68 | 3.23 | -0.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.67 | 9.78 | +1.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VT vs. TDIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VT drawdown since its inception was -50.27%, which is greater than TDIV's maximum drawdown of -31.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VT and TDIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VT | TDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.27% | -31.97% | -18.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.67% | -11.35% | +1.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.51% | -23.00% | +6.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.38% | -31.97% | +5.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.24% | -31.97% | -2.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.92% | -8.87% | +6.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.01% | -4.85% | -2.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.22% | 3.74% | -1.52% |
Volatility
VT vs. TDIV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) is 5.26%, while First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund (TDIV) has a volatility of 9.90%. This indicates that VT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VT | TDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.26% | 9.90% | -4.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.01% | 15.62% | -4.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.38% | 19.72% | -6.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.15% | 20.90% | -4.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.27% | 20.96% | -3.69% |
VT vs. TDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
VT has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than TDIV's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
VT vs. TDIV - Dividend Comparison
VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, more than TDIV's 1.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TDIV First Trust NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index Fund | 1.20% | 1.40% | 1.59% | 1.74% | 2.51% | 1.76% | 2.07% | 2.27% | 2.97% | 2.27% | 2.45% | 2.52% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.61% | 1.82% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VT and TDIV have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TDIV has higher volatility (9.90%) compared to VT (5.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VT dropped -50.27% vs TDIV's -31.97%.
On 10-year performance, TDIV leads with 18.57% vs 12.93% for VT. On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VT has been the lower-risk option at 5.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, TDIV has performed better with a 18.57% return vs 12.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for TDIV.
VT has the higher dividend yield at 1.61%, compared with 1.20% for TDIV.
VT is categorized as Global Equities, while TDIV is Technology Equities. VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index, while TDIV tracks NASDAQ Technology Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VT and 0.50% for TDIV.
VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VT and TDIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer