VT vs. SPUS
VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) and SPUS (SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index, while SPUS is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Shariah Industry Exclusions Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VT returned 10.99%/yr vs 17.46%/yr for SPUS. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VT charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for SPUS.
Performance
VT vs. SPUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VT achieves a 12.24% return, which is significantly lower than SPUS's 15.82% return.
VT
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- 4.91%
- YTD
- 12.24%
- 6M
- 13.14%
- 1Y
- 29.24%
- 3Y*
- 20.93%
- 5Y*
- 10.99%
- 10Y*
- 12.74%
SPUS
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 9.49%
- YTD
- 15.82%
- 6M
- 15.21%
- 1Y
- 40.24%
- 3Y*
- 24.89%
- 5Y*
- 17.46%
- 10Y*
- —
VT vs. SPUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 12.24% | 22.43% | 16.49% | 22.02% | -18.00% | 18.27% | 16.59% | 0.97% |
SPUS SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF | 15.82% | 19.77% | 26.49% | 34.24% | -22.76% | 35.92% | 25.68% | 0.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between VT and SPUS is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2019 | 0.90 |
The correlation between VT and SPUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
VT vs. SPUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VT
SPUS
Technology
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
VT
SPUS
Financial Services
VT
SPUS
-
Industrials
VT
SPUS
Consumer Cyclical
VT
SPUS
Communication Services
VT
SPUS
Healthcare
VT
SPUS
Consumer Defensive
VT
SPUS
Energy
VT
SPUS
Basic Materials
VT
SPUS
Utilities
VT
SPUS
Real Estate
VT
SPUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VT vs. SPUS — Risk / Return Rank
VT
SPUS
VT vs. SPUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VT | SPUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.49 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.04 | 3.79 | -0.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.53 | 16.32 | -2.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VT | SPUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.31 | 2.86 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.91 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.91 | -0.48 |
Drawdowns
VT vs. SPUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VT drawdown since its inception was -50.27%, which is greater than SPUS's maximum drawdown of -30.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VT and SPUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VT | SPUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.27% | -30.80% | -19.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.67% | -10.66% | +0.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.51% | -22.82% | +6.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.38% | -28.06% | +1.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.24% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.88% | -0.86% | -0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.02% | -6.21% | -0.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.17% | 2.47% | -0.30% |
Volatility
VT vs. SPUS - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS) have volatilities of 3.83% and 4.00%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VT | SPUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.83% | 4.00% | -0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.17% | 10.84% | -0.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.70% | 14.16% | -1.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.05% | 19.23% | -3.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.23% | 21.28% | -4.05% |
VT vs. SPUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
VT has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than SPUS's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
VT vs. SPUS - Dividend Comparison
VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, more than SPUS's 0.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPUS SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF | 0.52% | 0.60% | 0.70% | 0.87% | 1.21% | 1.15% | 1.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.59% | 1.82% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VT and SPUS have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPUS has higher volatility (4.00%) compared to VT (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VT dropped -50.27% vs SPUS's -30.80%.
On 5-year performance, SPUS leads with 17.46% vs 10.99% for VT. On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VT has been the lower-risk option at 3.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPUS has performed better with a 17.46% return vs 10.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for SPUS.
VT has the higher dividend yield at 1.59%, compared with 0.52% for SPUS.
VT is categorized as Global Equities, while SPUS is S&P 500. VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index, while SPUS tracks S&P 500 Shariah Industry Exclusions Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and SP Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VT and 0.45% for SPUS.
SPUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VT and SPUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer