PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VT vs. SPUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VT vs. SPUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VT achieves a 12.24% return, which is significantly lower than SPUS's 15.82% return.


VT

1D
-0.88%
1M
4.91%
YTD
12.24%
6M
13.14%
1Y
29.24%
3Y*
20.93%
5Y*
10.99%
10Y*
12.74%

SPUS

1D
-0.86%
1M
9.49%
YTD
15.82%
6M
15.21%
1Y
40.24%
3Y*
24.89%
5Y*
17.46%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VT vs. SPUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
12.24%22.43%16.49%22.02%-18.00%18.27%16.59%0.97%
SPUS
SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF
15.82%19.77%26.49%34.24%-22.76%35.92%25.68%0.81%

Correlation

The correlation between VT and SPUS is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2019

0.90

The correlation between VT and SPUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

VT vs. SPUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VT
SPUS

Technology

27.8%
57.3%

Financial Services

15.9%

-

Industrials

12.0%
7.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
7.3%

Communication Services

8.3%
6.4%

Healthcare

8.1%
11.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
2.9%

Energy

4.3%
3.3%

Basic Materials

4.2%
3.0%

Utilities

2.7%
0.3%

Real Estate

2.4%
1.4%

Technology

VT
27.8%
SPUS
57.3%

Financial Services

VT
15.9%
SPUS

-

Industrials

VT
12.0%
SPUS
7.0%

Consumer Cyclical

VT
9.5%
SPUS
7.3%

Communication Services

VT
8.3%
SPUS
6.4%

Healthcare

VT
8.1%
SPUS
11.1%

Consumer Defensive

VT
4.8%
SPUS
2.9%

Energy

VT
4.3%
SPUS
3.3%

Basic Materials

VT
4.2%
SPUS
3.0%

Utilities

VT
2.7%
SPUS
0.3%

Real Estate

VT
2.4%
SPUS
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VT vs. SPUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VT
VT Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

SPUS
SPUS Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
SPUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPUS Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
SPUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VT vs. SPUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VTSPUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.49

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.04

3.79

-0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.53

16.32

-2.79

VT vs. SPUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VT Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the SPUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VT and SPUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VTSPUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.31

2.86

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.91

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.91

-0.48

Drawdowns

VT vs. SPUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VT drawdown since its inception was -50.27%, which is greater than SPUS's maximum drawdown of -30.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VT and SPUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTSPUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.27%

-30.80%

-19.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.67%

-10.66%

+0.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.51%

-22.82%

+6.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.38%

-28.06%

+1.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.88%

-0.86%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.02%

-6.21%

-0.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.17%

2.47%

-0.30%

Volatility

VT vs. SPUS - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS) have volatilities of 3.83% and 4.00%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTSPUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.83%

4.00%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.17%

10.84%

-0.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.70%

14.16%

-1.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.05%

19.23%

-3.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.23%

21.28%

-4.05%

VT vs. SPUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

VT has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than SPUS's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

VT vs. SPUS - Dividend Comparison

VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, more than SPUS's 0.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPUS
SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF
0.52%0.60%0.70%0.87%1.21%1.15%1.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
1.59%1.82%1.95%2.08%2.20%1.82%1.66%2.32%2.53%2.11%2.39%2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


VT and SPUS have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPUS has higher volatility (4.00%) compared to VT (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VT dropped -50.27% vs SPUS's -30.80%.

On 5-year performance, SPUS leads with 17.46% vs 10.99% for VT. On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VT has been the lower-risk option at 3.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SPUS has performed better with a 17.46% return vs 10.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for SPUS.

VT has the higher dividend yield at 1.59%, compared with 0.52% for SPUS.

VT is categorized as Global Equities, while SPUS is S&P 500. VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index, while SPUS tracks S&P 500 Shariah Industry Exclusions Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and SP Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VT and 0.45% for SPUS.

SPUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VT and SPUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer