VT vs. PICK
VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) and PICK (iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index, while PICK is a Materials fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Select Metals & Mining Producers Ex Gold & Silver Investable Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VT returned 12.93%/yr vs 17.70%/yr for PICK. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VT charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for PICK.
Performance
VT vs. PICK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VT achieves a 11.06% return, which is significantly lower than PICK's 26.76% return. Over the past 10 years, VT has underperformed PICK with an annualized return of 12.93%, while PICK has yielded a comparatively higher 17.70% annualized return.
VT
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 1.80%
- YTD
- 11.06%
- 6M
- 11.82%
- 1Y
- 27.43%
- 3Y*
- 19.71%
- 5Y*
- 10.65%
- 10Y*
- 12.93%
PICK
- 1D
- 2.04%
- 1M
- 3.45%
- YTD
- 26.76%
- 6M
- 32.91%
- 1Y
- 79.94%
- 3Y*
- 19.94%
- 5Y*
- 11.31%
- 10Y*
- 17.70%
VT vs. PICK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 11.06% | 22.43% | 16.49% | 22.02% | -18.00% | 18.27% | 16.59% | 26.81% | -9.76% | 24.50% |
PICK iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF | 26.76% | 51.89% | -16.37% | 9.69% | 2.54% | 22.61% | 27.46% | 16.47% | -18.65% | 38.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between VT and PICK is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2012 | 0.71 |
The correlation between VT and PICK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
VT vs. PICK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VT
PICK
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
VT
PICK
Financial Services
VT
PICK
Industrials
VT
PICK
Consumer Cyclical
VT
PICK
-
Communication Services
VT
PICK
-
Healthcare
VT
PICK
-
Consumer Defensive
VT
PICK
Energy
VT
PICK
Basic Materials
VT
PICK
Utilities
VT
PICK
-
Real Estate
VT
PICK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VT vs. PICK — Risk / Return Rank
VT
PICK
VT vs. PICK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VT | PICK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.44 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.68 | 4.00 | -1.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.67 | 15.40 | -3.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VT vs. PICK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VT drawdown since its inception was -50.27%, smaller than the maximum PICK drawdown of -68.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VT and PICK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VT | PICK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.27% | -68.87% | +18.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.67% | -19.54% | +9.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.51% | -32.52% | +16.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.38% | -36.37% | +9.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.24% | -52.72% | +18.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.92% | -5.59% | +3.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.01% | -24.08% | +17.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.22% | 5.07% | -2.85% |
Volatility
VT vs. PICK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) is 5.26%, while iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK) has a volatility of 13.70%. This indicates that VT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PICK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VT | PICK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.26% | 13.70% | -8.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.01% | 25.93% | -14.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.38% | 29.74% | -16.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.15% | 28.11% | -11.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.27% | 28.46% | -11.19% |
VT vs. PICK - Expense Ratio Comparison
VT has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than PICK's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
VT vs. PICK - Dividend Comparison
VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than PICK's 2.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PICK iShares MSCI Global Select Metals & Mining Producers ETF | 2.27% | 2.88% | 3.26% | 4.19% | 6.93% | 5.89% | 2.27% | 5.51% | 4.77% | 2.41% | 1.15% | 15.77% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.61% | 1.82% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VT and PICK have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PICK has higher volatility (13.70%) compared to VT (5.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VT dropped -50.27% vs PICK's -68.87%.
On 10-year performance, PICK leads with 17.70% vs 12.93% for VT. On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VT has been the lower-risk option at 5.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PICK has performed better with a 17.70% return vs 12.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for PICK.
PICK has the higher dividend yield at 2.27%, compared with 1.61% for VT.
VT is categorized as Global Equities, while PICK is Materials. VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index, while PICK tracks MSCI ACWI Select Metals & Mining Producers Ex Gold & Silver Investable Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VT and 0.39% for PICK.
PICK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VT and PICK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer