VT vs. LVHI
VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) and LVHI (Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index, while LVHI is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VT returned 11.15%/yr vs 15.66%/yr for LVHI. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VT charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for LVHI.
Performance
VT vs. LVHI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VT having a 12.78% return and LVHI slightly higher at 13.06%.
VT
- 1D
- 1.55%
- 1M
- 3.39%
- YTD
- 12.78%
- 6M
- 13.56%
- 1Y
- 29.41%
- 3Y*
- 19.92%
- 5Y*
- 11.15%
- 10Y*
- 13.03%
LVHI
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 1.03%
- YTD
- 13.06%
- 6M
- 13.70%
- 1Y
- 31.29%
- 3Y*
- 21.07%
- 5Y*
- 15.66%
- 10Y*
- —
VT vs. LVHI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 12.78% | 22.43% | 16.49% | 22.02% | -18.00% | 18.27% | 16.59% | 26.81% | -9.76% | 24.50% |
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 13.06% | 27.12% | 14.81% | 17.45% | 3.84% | 18.19% | -8.76% | 18.35% | -5.22% | 12.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between VT and LVHI is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2016 | 0.63 |
The correlation between VT and LVHI shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.67 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VT vs. LVHI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VT
LVHI
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
VT
LVHI
Financial Services
VT
LVHI
Industrials
VT
LVHI
Consumer Cyclical
VT
LVHI
Communication Services
VT
LVHI
Healthcare
VT
LVHI
Consumer Defensive
VT
LVHI
Energy
VT
LVHI
Basic Materials
VT
LVHI
Utilities
VT
LVHI
Real Estate
VT
LVHI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VT vs. LVHI — Risk / Return Rank
VT
LVHI
VT vs. LVHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VT | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.62 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.05 | 5.17 | -2.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.29 | 21.39 | -8.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VT vs. LVHI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VT drawdown since its inception was -50.27%, which is greater than LVHI's maximum drawdown of -32.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VT and LVHI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VT | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.27% | -32.31% | -17.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.67% | -6.08% | -3.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.51% | -11.99% | -4.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.38% | -11.99% | -14.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.24% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.40% | -0.63% | +0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.01% | -3.51% | -3.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.22% | 1.47% | +0.75% |
Volatility
VT vs. LVHI - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) has a higher volatility of 5.46% compared to Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) at 2.83%. This indicates that VT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LVHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VT | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.46% | 2.83% | +2.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.11% | 7.76% | +3.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.41% | 9.63% | +3.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.17% | 11.09% | +5.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.28% | 13.75% | +3.53% |
VT vs. LVHI - Expense Ratio Comparison
VT has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than LVHI's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
VT vs. LVHI - Dividend Comparison
VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, less than LVHI's 4.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 4.72% | 4.92% | 3.98% | 8.12% | 7.74% | 4.13% | 3.97% | 6.67% | 10.67% | 3.38% | 2.02% | 0.00% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.58% | 1.82% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VT and LVHI have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VT has higher volatility (5.46%) compared to LVHI (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VT dropped -50.27% vs LVHI's -32.31%.
On 5-year performance, LVHI leads with 15.66% vs 11.15% for VT. On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, LVHI has been the lower-risk option at 2.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, LVHI has performed better with a 15.66% return vs 11.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for LVHI.
LVHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.72%, compared with 1.58% for VT.
VT is categorized as Global Equities, while LVHI is Volatility Hedged Equity. VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index, while LVHI tracks Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VT and 0.40% for LVHI.
LVHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.27 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VT and LVHI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer