PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
VT vs. IYH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

VT vs. IYH

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) and IYH (iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index, while IYH is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Health Care Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VT returned 13.03%/yr vs 9.63%/yr for IYH. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VT charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for IYH.

Performance

VT vs. IYH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF (IYH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VT achieves a 12.78% return, which is significantly higher than IYH's -1.10% return. Over the past 10 years, VT has outperformed IYH with an annualized return of 13.03%, while IYH has yielded a comparatively lower 9.63% annualized return.

VT

1D
1.55%
1M
3.39%
YTD
12.78%
6M
13.56%
1Y
29.41%
3Y*
19.92%
5Y*
11.15%
10Y*
13.03%

IYH

1D
-0.46%
1M
5.37%
YTD
-1.10%
6M
-1.60%
1Y
14.30%
3Y*
6.09%
5Y*
4.89%
10Y*
9.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VT vs. IYH - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF		12.78%22.43%16.49%22.02%-18.00%18.27%16.59%26.81%-9.76%24.50%
IYH
iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF		-1.10%13.16%2.99%2.14%-4.46%23.41%15.56%20.80%5.80%22.27%

Correlation

The correlation between VT and IYH is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2008

0.70

Over the past year, the correlation between VT and IYH has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VT vs. IYH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
VT
IYH

Technology

27.8%

-

Financial Services

15.9%

-

Industrials

12.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%

-

Communication Services

8.3%

-

Healthcare

8.1%
100.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%

-

Energy

4.3%

-

Basic Materials

4.2%

-

Utilities

2.7%

-

Real Estate

2.4%

-

Technology

VT
27.8%
IYH

-

Financial Services

VT
15.9%
IYH

-

Industrials

VT
12.0%
IYH

-

Consumer Cyclical

VT
9.5%
IYH

-

Communication Services

VT
8.3%
IYH

-

Healthcare

VT
8.1%
IYH
100.0%

Consumer Defensive

VT
4.8%
IYH

-

Energy

VT
4.3%
IYH

-

Basic Materials

VT
4.2%
IYH

-

Utilities

VT
2.7%
IYH

-

Real Estate

VT
2.4%
IYH

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Vanguard Total World Stock ETF

iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF

Often compared with VT:
VT vs. VOOVT vs. VTIVT vs. VXUSVT vs. SPYVT vs. ACWIVT vs. VWRA.LVT vs. VWCE.DE
Often compared with IYH:
IYH vs. VHTIYH vs. XLVIYH vs. SPYIYH vs. IYEIYH vs. IFRAIYH vs. BMEDIYH vs. IBB

Return for Risk

VT vs. IYH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
VT
VT Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
IYH
IYH Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
IYH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYH Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
IYH Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYH Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VT vs. IYH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF (IYH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

VTIYHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.21
0.95

+1.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.02
1.53

+1.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.17

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.05

1.35

+1.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.29

3.21

+10.07

VT vs. IYH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VT Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is higher than the IYH Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VT and IYH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VT vs. IYH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VT drawdown since its inception was -50.27%, which is greater than IYH's maximum drawdown of -43.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VT and IYH.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

VTIYHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.27%

-43.12%

-7.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.67%

-10.64%

+0.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.51%

-17.91%

+1.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.38%

-17.91%

-8.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.24%

-28.40%

-5.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.40%

-4.38%

+3.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.01%

-8.96%

+1.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.22%

4.46%

-2.24%

Volatility

VT vs. IYH - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) has a higher volatility of 5.46% compared to iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF (IYH) at 4.97%. This indicates that VT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IYH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

VTIYHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.46%

4.97%

+0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.11%

10.61%

+0.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.41%

15.11%

-1.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.17%

14.97%

+1.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.28%

16.75%

+0.53%

VT vs. IYH - Expense Ratio Comparison

VT has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than IYH's 0.43% expense ratio.

Dividends

VT vs. IYH - Dividend Comparison

VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, more than IYH's 1.51% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IYH
iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF		1.51%1.19%1.25%1.18%1.10%0.94%1.16%1.14%1.95%1.10%1.29%2.02%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF		1.58%1.82%1.95%2.08%2.20%1.82%1.66%2.32%2.53%2.11%2.39%2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

VT and IYH have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VT has higher volatility (5.46%) compared to IYH (4.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VT dropped -50.27% vs IYH's -43.12%.

On 10-year performance, VT leads with 13.03% vs 9.63% for IYH. On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, IYH has been the lower-risk option at 4.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VT has performed better with a 13.03% return vs 9.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for IYH.

VT has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 1.51% for IYH.

VT is categorized as Global Equities, while IYH is Health & Biotech Equities. VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index, while IYH tracks Dow Jones U.S. Health Care Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VT and 0.43% for IYH.

VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VT and IYH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer