PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VT vs. IWDA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VT vs. IWDA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VT achieves a 9.20% return, which is significantly higher than IWDA.L's 8.56% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VT having a 12.30% annualized return and IWDA.L not far ahead at 12.87%.


VT

1D
-3.07%
1M
-0.89%
YTD
9.20%
6M
9.69%
1Y
25.79%
3Y*
19.73%
5Y*
10.38%
10Y*
12.30%

IWDA.L

1D
-1.16%
1M
1.25%
YTD
8.56%
6M
9.52%
1Y
24.21%
3Y*
20.33%
5Y*
11.59%
10Y*
12.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VT vs. IWDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
9.20%22.43%16.49%22.02%-18.00%18.27%16.59%26.81%-9.76%24.50%
IWDA.L
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
8.56%21.03%19.11%24.27%-18.11%22.19%16.06%27.13%-9.01%22.75%

Correlation

The correlation between VT and IWDA.L is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2009

0.58

The correlation between VT and IWDA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (all time) to 0.69 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VT vs. IWDA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VT
IWDA.L

Technology

27.8%
32.9%

Financial Services

15.9%
14.9%

Industrials

12.0%
9.7%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
8.8%

Communication Services

8.3%
9.3%

Healthcare

8.1%
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
4.8%

Energy

4.3%
3.9%

Basic Materials

4.2%
2.8%

Utilities

2.7%
2.4%

Real Estate

2.4%
1.2%

Technology

VT
27.8%
IWDA.L
32.9%

Financial Services

VT
15.9%
IWDA.L
14.9%

Industrials

VT
12.0%
IWDA.L
9.7%

Consumer Cyclical

VT
9.5%
IWDA.L
8.8%

Communication Services

VT
8.3%
IWDA.L
9.3%

Healthcare

VT
8.1%
IWDA.L
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

VT
4.8%
IWDA.L
4.8%

Energy

VT
4.3%
IWDA.L
3.9%

Basic Materials

VT
4.2%
IWDA.L
2.8%

Utilities

VT
2.7%
IWDA.L
2.4%

Real Estate

VT
2.4%
IWDA.L
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VT vs. IWDA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VT
VT Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

IWDA.L
IWDA.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
IWDA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWDA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWDA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
IWDA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWDA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VT vs. IWDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VTIWDA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.36

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

2.90

-0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.87

12.25

-0.38

VT vs. IWDA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VT Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the IWDA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VT and IWDA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VTIWDA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98

2.01

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.74

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.81

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.71

-0.28

Drawdowns

VT vs. IWDA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VT drawdown since its inception was -50.27%, which is greater than IWDA.L's maximum drawdown of -34.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VT and IWDA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTIWDA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.27%

-34.11%

-16.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.67%

-8.31%

-1.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.51%

-16.94%

+0.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.38%

-25.88%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.24%

-34.11%

-0.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.56%

-1.58%

-1.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.02%

-4.41%

-2.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.18%

1.97%

+0.21%

Volatility

VT vs. IWDA.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) has a higher volatility of 4.60% compared to iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L) at 3.33%. This indicates that VT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTIWDA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.60%

3.33%

+1.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.66%

9.27%

+1.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.09%

11.99%

+1.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.10%

15.68%

+0.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.26%

15.91%

+1.35%

VT vs. IWDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VT has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than IWDA.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VT vs. IWDA.L - Dividend Comparison

VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, while IWDA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWDA.L
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
1.64%1.82%1.95%2.08%2.20%1.82%1.66%2.32%2.53%2.11%2.39%2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


VT and IWDA.L have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IWDA.L.

VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index, while IWDA.L tracks MSCI World Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VT and 0.20% for IWDA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VT and IWDA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer