VT vs. IWDA.L
VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) and IWDA.L (iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Global Equities funds - VT tracks the FTSE Global All Cap Index while IWDA.L tracks the MSCI World Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VT returned 12.30%/yr vs 12.87%/yr for IWDA.L. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VT charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for IWDA.L.
Performance
VT vs. IWDA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VT achieves a 9.20% return, which is significantly higher than IWDA.L's 8.56% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VT having a 12.30% annualized return and IWDA.L not far ahead at 12.87%.
VT
- 1D
- -3.07%
- 1M
- -0.89%
- YTD
- 9.20%
- 6M
- 9.69%
- 1Y
- 25.79%
- 3Y*
- 19.73%
- 5Y*
- 10.38%
- 10Y*
- 12.30%
IWDA.L
- 1D
- -1.16%
- 1M
- 1.25%
- YTD
- 8.56%
- 6M
- 9.52%
- 1Y
- 24.21%
- 3Y*
- 20.33%
- 5Y*
- 11.59%
- 10Y*
- 12.87%
VT vs. IWDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 9.20% | 22.43% | 16.49% | 22.02% | -18.00% | 18.27% | 16.59% | 26.81% | -9.76% | 24.50% |
IWDA.L iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 8.56% | 21.03% | 19.11% | 24.27% | -18.11% | 22.19% | 16.06% | 27.13% | -9.01% | 22.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between VT and IWDA.L is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2009 | 0.58 |
The correlation between VT and IWDA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (all time) to 0.69 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VT vs. IWDA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VT
IWDA.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
VT
IWDA.L
Financial Services
VT
IWDA.L
Industrials
VT
IWDA.L
Consumer Cyclical
VT
IWDA.L
Communication Services
VT
IWDA.L
Healthcare
VT
IWDA.L
Consumer Defensive
VT
IWDA.L
Energy
VT
IWDA.L
Basic Materials
VT
IWDA.L
Utilities
VT
IWDA.L
Real Estate
VT
IWDA.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VT vs. IWDA.L — Risk / Return Rank
VT
IWDA.L
VT vs. IWDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VT | IWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.36 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.68 | 2.90 | -0.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.87 | 12.25 | -0.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VT | IWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98 | 2.01 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 0.74 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 | 0.81 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.71 | -0.28 |
Drawdowns
VT vs. IWDA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VT drawdown since its inception was -50.27%, which is greater than IWDA.L's maximum drawdown of -34.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VT and IWDA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VT | IWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.27% | -34.11% | -16.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.67% | -8.31% | -1.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.51% | -16.94% | +0.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.38% | -25.88% | -0.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.24% | -34.11% | -0.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.56% | -1.58% | -1.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.02% | -4.41% | -2.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.18% | 1.97% | +0.21% |
Volatility
VT vs. IWDA.L - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) has a higher volatility of 4.60% compared to iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L) at 3.33%. This indicates that VT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VT | IWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.60% | 3.33% | +1.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.66% | 9.27% | +1.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.09% | 11.99% | +1.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.10% | 15.68% | +0.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.26% | 15.91% | +1.35% |
VT vs. IWDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VT has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than IWDA.L's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VT vs. IWDA.L - Dividend Comparison
VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, while IWDA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWDA.L iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.64% | 1.82% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VT and IWDA.L have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IWDA.L.
VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index, while IWDA.L tracks MSCI World Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VT and 0.20% for IWDA.L.
Find the right allocation for VT and IWDA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer