IWDA.L vs. URTH
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L) and iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH).
IWDA.L and URTH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IWDA.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World Index. It was launched on Sep 25, 2009. URTH is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World Index. It was launched on Jan 10, 2012. Both IWDA.L and URTH are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IWDA.L or URTH.
Key characteristics
| IWDA.L | URTH | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 11.97% | 11.98% |
| 1Y Return | 21.28% | 21.02% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 5.40% | 5.38% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 11.85% | 11.94% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 9.30% | 9.43% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.74 | 1.68 |
| Daily Std Dev | 11.94% | 12.31% |
| Max Drawdown | -34.11% | -34.01% |
| Current Drawdown | -3.84% | -4.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWDA.L and URTH is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
IWDA.L vs. URTH - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IWDA.L having a 11.97% return and URTH slightly higher at 11.98%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IWDA.L having a 9.30% annualized return and URTH not far ahead at 9.43%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IWDA.L vs. URTH - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWDA.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than URTH's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IWDA.L vs. URTH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L) and iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IWDA.L vs. URTH - Dividend Comparison
IWDA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while URTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWDA.L iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
URTH iShares MSCI World ETF | 1.54% | 1.70% | 1.68% | 1.50% | 1.52% | 2.16% | 2.30% | 1.88% | 2.15% | 2.35% | 2.31% | 1.04% |
Drawdowns
IWDA.L vs. URTH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWDA.L drawdown since its inception was -34.11%, roughly equal to the maximum URTH drawdown of -34.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWDA.L and URTH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IWDA.L vs. URTH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IWDA.L) is 3.44%, while iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH) has a volatility of 4.36%. This indicates that IWDA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URTH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.