PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VT vs. IDGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VT vs. IDGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VT achieves a 12.36% return, which is significantly lower than IDGT's 48.60% return. Over the past 10 years, VT has underperformed IDGT with an annualized return of 13.20%, while IDGT has yielded a comparatively higher 14.61% annualized return.


VT

1D
-0.06%
1M
1.64%
YTD
12.36%
6M
12.14%
1Y
29.57%
3Y*
20.75%
5Y*
11.13%
10Y*
13.20%

IDGT

1D
1.64%
1M
1.10%
YTD
48.60%
6M
47.03%
1Y
58.23%
3Y*
24.83%
5Y*
12.59%
10Y*
14.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VT vs. IDGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
12.36%22.43%16.49%22.02%-18.00%18.27%16.59%26.81%-9.76%24.50%
IDGT
iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF
48.60%6.79%26.71%-6.09%-17.90%42.14%8.78%17.39%-1.97%11.81%

Correlation

The correlation between VT and IDGT is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2008

0.75

The correlation between VT and IDGT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

VT vs. IDGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VT
IDGT

Technology

31.1%
56.9%

Financial Services

15.2%

-

Industrials

11.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%

-

Communication Services

8.0%
6.7%

Healthcare

7.9%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.5%

-

Basic Materials

4.1%

-

Energy

3.8%

-

Utilities

2.4%

-

Real Estate

2.3%
35.5%

Technology

VT
31.1%
IDGT
56.9%

Financial Services

VT
15.2%
IDGT

-

Industrials

VT
11.4%
IDGT

-

Consumer Cyclical

VT
9.3%
IDGT

-

Communication Services

VT
8.0%
IDGT
6.7%

Healthcare

VT
7.9%
IDGT

-

Consumer Defensive

VT
4.5%
IDGT

-

Basic Materials

VT
4.1%
IDGT

-

Energy

VT
3.8%
IDGT

-

Utilities

VT
2.4%
IDGT

-

Real Estate

VT
2.3%
IDGT
35.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VT vs. IDGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VT
VT Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

IDGT
IDGT Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
IDGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDGT Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
IDGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDGT Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VT vs. IDGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VTIDGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.46

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.07

6.49

-3.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.35

18.73

-5.38

VT vs. IDGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VT Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is comparable to the IDGT Sharpe Ratio of 2.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VT and IDGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VT vs. IDGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VT drawdown since its inception was -50.27%, smaller than the maximum IDGT drawdown of -77.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VT and IDGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTIDGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.27%

-77.95%

+27.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.67%

-9.02%

-0.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.51%

-23.74%

+7.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.38%

-35.83%

+9.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.24%

-36.88%

+2.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.77%

-4.96%

+4.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.00%

-19.88%

+12.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.22%

3.12%

-0.90%

Volatility

VT vs. IDGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) is 5.23%, while iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT) has a volatility of 9.03%. This indicates that VT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTIDGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.23%

9.03%

-3.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.12%

17.48%

-6.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.44%

21.36%

-7.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.16%

23.34%

-7.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.27%

23.38%

-6.11%

VT vs. IDGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

VT has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than IDGT's 0.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

VT vs. IDGT - Dividend Comparison

VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, more than IDGT's 0.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDGT
iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF
0.72%1.17%1.64%0.37%0.30%0.28%0.60%0.42%0.65%0.57%0.75%0.72%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
1.58%1.82%1.95%2.08%2.20%1.82%1.66%2.32%2.53%2.11%2.39%2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


VT and IDGT have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDGT has higher volatility (9.03%) compared to VT (5.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VT dropped -50.27% vs IDGT's -77.95%.

On 10-year performance, IDGT leads with 14.61% vs 13.20% for VT. On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VT has been the lower-risk option at 5.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IDGT has performed better with a 14.61% return vs 13.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for IDGT.

VT has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 0.72% for IDGT.

VT is categorized as Global Equities, while IDGT is Technology Equities. VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index, while IDGT tracks S&P Data Center, Tower REIT and Communications Equipment Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VT and 0.41% for IDGT.

IDGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 2.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VT and IDGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer