VT vs. FWD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) and FWD (AB Disruptors ETF) are both Global Equities funds. VT is passively managed, while FWD is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, VT returned 20.93%/yr vs 39.48%/yr for FWD. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VT charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for FWD.

Performance

VT vs. FWD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and AB Disruptors ETF (FWD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VT achieves a 12.24% return, which is significantly lower than FWD's 40.11% return.

VT

• 1D: -0.88%
• 1M: 4.91%
• YTD: 12.24%
• 6M: 13.14%
• 1Y: 29.24%
• 3Y*: 20.93%
• 5Y*: 10.99%
• 10Y*: 12.74%

FWD

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: 14.15%
• YTD: 40.11%
• 6M: 39.78%
• 1Y: 75.95%
• 3Y*: 39.48%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VT vs. FWD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	12.24%	22.43%	16.49%	18.49%
FWD AB Disruptors ETF	40.11%	32.00%	29.23%	25.66%

Correlation

The correlation between VT and FWD is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2023	0.86

The correlation between VT and FWD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

VT vs. FWD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VT	FWD
Technology	27.8%	52.6%
Financial Services	15.9%	0.5%
Industrials	12.0%	17.7%
Consumer Cyclical	9.5%	2.4%
Communication Services	8.3%	2.6%
Healthcare	8.1%	6.6%
Consumer Defensive	4.8%	0.8%
Energy	4.3%	2.6%
Basic Materials	4.2%	1.8%
Utilities	2.7%	1.0%
Real Estate	2.4%	0.7%

Return for Risk

VT vs. FWD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VT

VT Risk / Return Rank: 67
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 67
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 71

FWD

FWD Risk / Return Rank: 87
FWD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
FWD Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
FWD Omega Ratio Rank: 83
FWD Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
FWD Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VT vs. FWD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and AB Disruptors ETF (FWD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VT	FWD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.31	3.16	-0.85
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.20	3.78	-0.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.50	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.04	5.86	-2.83
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.53	20.83	-7.30
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VT vs. FWD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VT Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the FWD Sharpe Ratio of 3.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VT and FWD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VT	FWD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.31	3.16	-0.85
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.74	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	1.67	-1.23

Drawdowns

VT vs. FWD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VT drawdown since its inception was -50.27%, which is greater than FWD's maximum drawdown of -29.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VT and FWD.

Drawdown Indicators

	VT	FWD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.27%	-29.02%	-21.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.67%	-13.03%	+3.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.51%	-29.02%	+12.51%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.38%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.24%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.88%	-0.27%	-0.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.02%	-4.06%	-2.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.17%	3.66%	-1.49%

Volatility

VT vs. FWD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) is 3.83%, while AB Disruptors ETF (FWD) has a volatility of 7.77%. This indicates that VT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FWD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VT	FWD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.83%	7.77%	-3.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.17%	18.96%	-8.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.70%	24.15%	-11.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.05%	24.72%	-8.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.23%	24.72%	-7.49%

VT vs. FWD - Expense Ratio Comparison

VT has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than FWD's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

VT vs. FWD - Dividend Comparison

VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, more than FWD's 0.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FWD AB Disruptors ETF	0.08%	0.11%	1.89%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	1.59%	1.82%	1.95%	2.08%	2.20%	1.82%	1.66%	2.32%	2.53%	2.11%	2.39%	2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VT and FWD in my portfolio?

VT and FWD have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VT or FWD?

FWD has higher volatility (7.77%) compared to VT (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VT dropped -50.27% vs FWD's -29.02%.

Which ETF is better, VT or FWD?

On 3-year performance, FWD leads with 39.48% vs 20.93% for VT. On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VT has been the lower-risk option at 3.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VT or FWD?

Over the 3-year period, FWD has performed better with a 39.48% return vs 20.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VT or FWD?

VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FWD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VT or FWD?

VT has the higher dividend yield at 1.59%, compared with 0.08% for FWD.

What is the main difference between VT and FWD?

They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and AllianceBernstein. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VT and 0.65% for FWD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FWD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.16 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.