PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VT vs. AQMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VT vs. AQMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund (AQMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VT having a 11.06% return and AQMIX slightly higher at 11.18%. Over the past 10 years, VT has outperformed AQMIX with an annualized return of 12.93%, while AQMIX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.69% annualized return.


VT

1D
0.44%
1M
0.57%
YTD
11.06%
6M
11.82%
1Y
25.83%
3Y*
19.71%
5Y*
10.65%
10Y*
12.93%

AQMIX

1D
-0.37%
1M
-2.21%
YTD
11.18%
6M
13.01%
1Y
24.10%
3Y*
12.13%
5Y*
12.71%
10Y*
4.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VT vs. AQMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
11.06%22.43%16.49%22.02%-18.00%18.27%16.59%26.81%-9.76%24.50%
AQMIX
AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund
11.18%14.62%8.13%2.08%35.47%-1.04%-0.43%1.92%-8.88%-0.97%

Correlation

The correlation between VT and AQMIX is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2010

0.05

The correlation between VT and AQMIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (5 years) to 0.15 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VT vs. AQMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VT
VT Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

AQMIX
AQMIX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
AQMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AQMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
AQMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
AQMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
AQMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VT vs. AQMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund (AQMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VTAQMIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.50

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

8.20

-5.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.67

26.10

-14.43

VT vs. AQMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VT Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is lower than the AQMIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VT and AQMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VT vs. AQMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VT drawdown since its inception was -50.27%, which is greater than AQMIX's maximum drawdown of -26.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VT and AQMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTAQMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.27%

-26.52%

-23.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.67%

-3.02%

-6.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.51%

-13.57%

-2.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.38%

-13.57%

-12.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.24%

-23.34%

-10.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.92%

-2.30%

+0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.01%

-9.99%

+2.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.22%

0.94%

+1.28%

Volatility

VT vs. AQMIX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) has a higher volatility of 5.26% compared to AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund (AQMIX) at 2.41%. This indicates that VT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AQMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTAQMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.26%

2.41%

+2.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.01%

6.72%

+4.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.38%

8.74%

+4.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.15%

11.62%

+4.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.27%

10.37%

+6.90%

VT vs. AQMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VT has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than AQMIX's 1.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

VT vs. AQMIX - Dividend Comparison

VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than AQMIX's 2.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AQMIX
AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund
2.03%2.26%3.83%8.39%12.76%6.94%5.31%3.13%0.00%0.00%0.02%6.51%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
1.61%1.82%1.95%2.08%2.20%1.82%1.66%2.32%2.53%2.11%2.39%2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


VT and AQMIX have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VT has higher volatility (5.26%) compared to AQMIX (2.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VT dropped -50.27% vs AQMIX's -26.52%.

AQMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VT and AQMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer