AQMIX vs. DBMF
AQMIX (AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund) and DBMF (iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF) are both Systematic Trend funds. Over the past 5 years, AQMIX returned 12.55%/yr vs 8.58%/yr for DBMF. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AQMIX charges 1.25%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DBMF.
Performance
AQMIX vs. DBMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with AQMIX having a 12.43% return and DBMF slightly lower at 12.38%.
AQMIX
- 1D
- 1.32%
- 1M
- 1.32%
- YTD
- 12.43%
- 6M
- 13.93%
- 1Y
- 24.36%
- 3Y*
- 12.34%
- 5Y*
- 12.55%
- 10Y*
- 4.95%
DBMF
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 2.88%
- YTD
- 12.38%
- 6M
- 14.24%
- 1Y
- 31.00%
- 3Y*
- 10.80%
- 5Y*
- 8.58%
- 10Y*
- —
AQMIX vs. DBMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AQMIX AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund | 12.43% | 14.62% | 8.13% | 2.08% | 35.47% | -1.04% | -0.43% | -0.09% |
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 12.38% | 13.85% | 7.24% | -8.94% | 21.61% | 11.49% | 1.80% | 10.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between AQMIX and DBMF is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2019 | 0.51 |
The correlation between AQMIX and DBMF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AQMIX vs. DBMF — Risk / Return Rank
AQMIX
DBMF
AQMIX vs. DBMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund (AQMIX) and iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AQMIX | DBMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.94 | 2.56 | +0.38 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.02 | 3.35 | +0.67 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | 1.54 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.49 | 5.21 | +3.28 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 26.42 | 19.24 | +7.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AQMIX | DBMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.94 | 2.56 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.09 | 0.69 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.77 | -0.35 |
Drawdowns
AQMIX vs. DBMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AQMIX drawdown since its inception was -26.52%, which is greater than DBMF's maximum drawdown of -20.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AQMIX and DBMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AQMIX | DBMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.52% | -20.39% | -6.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.02% | -6.10% | +3.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.57% | -15.60% | +2.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.57% | -20.39% | +6.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.10% | 0.00% | -1.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.01% | -6.59% | -3.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.97% | 1.65% | -0.68% |
Volatility
AQMIX vs. DBMF - Volatility Comparison
AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund (AQMIX) has a higher volatility of 2.56% compared to iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) at 2.16%. This indicates that AQMIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AQMIX | DBMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.56% | 2.16% | +0.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.60% | 9.80% | -3.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.70% | 12.18% | -3.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.62% | 12.53% | -0.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.37% | 12.42% | -2.05% |
AQMIX vs. DBMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
AQMIX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than DBMF's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
AQMIX vs. DBMF - Dividend Comparison
AQMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%, less than DBMF's 5.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AQMIX AQR Managed Futures Strategy Fund | 2.01% | 2.26% | 3.83% | 8.39% | 12.76% | 6.94% | 5.31% | 3.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 6.51% |
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 5.09% | 5.91% | 5.75% | 2.91% | 7.72% | 10.38% | 0.86% | 9.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AQMIX and DBMF have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AQMIX has higher volatility (2.56%) compared to DBMF (2.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AQMIX dropped -26.52% vs DBMF's -20.39%.
AQMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 2.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AQMIX and DBMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer