VSTS vs. CLMT
VSTS (Vestis Corporation) and CLMT (Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P.) are both stocks. VSTS operates in Rental & Leasing Services (Industrials), while CLMT operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy). Their 0.23 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
VSTS vs. CLMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
VSTS
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- 1.26%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
CLMT
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- 21.33%
- 6M
- 97.19%
- YTD
- 122.40%
- 1Y
- 184.91%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 58.51%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $42.38M | $45.42M | $36.57M | |
| $16.87M | $18.27M | $19.34M |
VSTS vs. CLMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
VSTS Vestis Corporation | 22.03% |
CLMT Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P. | 29.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between VSTS and CLMT is 0.23, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.23 |
Fundamentals
VSTS:
$1.91B
CLMT:
$3.85B
VSTS:
-$0.13
CLMT:
-$2.17
VSTS:
0.71
CLMT:
0.92
VSTS:
$2.71B
CLMT:
$4.17B
VSTS:
$532.15M
CLMT:
$239.60M
VSTS:
$211.50M
CLMT:
$67.00M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VSTS vs. CLMT — Risk / Return Rank
VSTS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CLMT
VSTS vs. CLMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vestis Corporation (VSTS) and Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P. (CLMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VSTS | CLMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.59 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 11.88 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 31.08 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VSTS vs. CLMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VSTS drawdown since its inception was -12.36%, smaller than the maximum CLMT drawdown of -61.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSTS and CLMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VSTS | CLMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.36% | -61.87% | +49.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.01% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.36% | 0.00% | -12.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.77% | -19.37% | +16.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.94% | — |
Volatility
VSTS vs. CLMT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VSTS | CLMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.45% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 32.14% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.56% | 41.95% | -1.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.56% | 59.82% | -19.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.56% | 59.82% | -19.26% |
Dividends
VSTS vs. CLMT - Dividend Comparison
Neither VSTS nor CLMT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
VSTS vs. CLMT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Vestis Corporation and Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
VSTS vs. CLMT - Profitability Comparison
VSTS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Vestis Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 659.44M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
CLMT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P. reported a gross profit of -87.50M and revenue of 1.03B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -8.5%.
VSTS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Vestis Corporation reported an operating income of 26.78M and revenue of 659.44M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.1%.
CLMT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P. reported an operating income of -165.80M and revenue of 1.03B, resulting in an operating margin of -16.1%.
VSTS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Vestis Corporation reported a net income of 2.60M and revenue of 659.44M, resulting in a net margin of 0.4%.
CLMT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P. reported a net income of -317.00M and revenue of 1.03B, resulting in a net margin of -30.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
VSTS and CLMT have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for VSTS and CLMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer