CLMT vs. CRF

In the year-to-date period, CLMT achieves a -36.51% return, which is significantly lower than CRF's -6.09% return. Over the past 10 years, CLMT has underperformed CRF with an annualized return of -5.44%, while CRF has yielded a comparatively higher 9.34% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P. (CLMT) and Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc. (CRF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current CLMT Sharpe Ratio is -0.18, which is lower than the CRF Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLMT and CRF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

CLMT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CRF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.30%.

The maximum CLMT drawdown since its inception was -96.83%, which is greater than CRF's maximum drawdown of -78.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLMT and CRF.

Calumet Specialty Products Partners, L.P. (CLMT) has a higher volatility of 12.63% compared to Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc. (CRF) at 7.13%. This indicates that CLMT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.