PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VSTCX vs. VGPMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VSTCX vs. VGPMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Strategic Small-Cap Equity Fund (VSTCX) and Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund (VGPMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VSTCX achieves a 18.22% return, which is significantly lower than VGPMX's 21.14% return. Over the past 10 years, VSTCX has outperformed VGPMX with an annualized return of 12.71%, while VGPMX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.53% annualized return.


VSTCX

1D
0.58%
1M
3.68%
YTD
18.22%
6M
18.42%
1Y
41.82%
3Y*
22.14%
5Y*
11.88%
10Y*
12.71%

VGPMX

1D
1.33%
1M
6.96%
YTD
21.14%
6M
25.95%
1Y
66.86%
3Y*
31.54%
5Y*
20.51%
10Y*
11.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VSTCX vs. VGPMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VSTCX
Vanguard Strategic Small-Cap Equity Fund
18.22%15.20%15.40%21.34%-13.00%33.53%8.38%22.18%-11.87%9.21%
VGPMX
Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund
21.14%65.96%5.78%10.06%7.34%19.50%17.21%20.67%-32.26%13.75%

Correlation

The correlation between VSTCX and VGPMX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2006

0.57

The correlation between VSTCX and VGPMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (all time) to 0.68 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VSTCX vs. VGPMX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VSTCX
VGPMX

Financial Services

18.3%
5.7%

Industrials

16.1%
2.6%

Technology

14.9%
9.5%

Healthcare

14.1%
11.9%

Consumer Cyclical

11.1%
5.1%

Real Estate

6.5%
2.2%

Energy

6.2%
4.4%

Basic Materials

5.2%
38.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.0%
9.4%

Communication Services

2.4%
6.5%

Utilities

2.3%
4.7%

Financial Services

VSTCX
18.3%
VGPMX
5.7%

Industrials

VSTCX
16.1%
VGPMX
2.6%

Technology

VSTCX
14.9%
VGPMX
9.5%

Healthcare

VSTCX
14.1%
VGPMX
11.9%

Consumer Cyclical

VSTCX
11.1%
VGPMX
5.1%

Real Estate

VSTCX
6.5%
VGPMX
2.2%

Energy

VSTCX
6.2%
VGPMX
4.4%

Basic Materials

VSTCX
5.2%
VGPMX
38.0%

Consumer Defensive

VSTCX
3.0%
VGPMX
9.4%

Communication Services

VSTCX
2.4%
VGPMX
6.5%

Utilities

VSTCX
2.3%
VGPMX
4.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VSTCX vs. VGPMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VSTCX
VSTCX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
VSTCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSTCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSTCX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
VSTCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSTCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

VGPMX
VGPMX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
VGPMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGPMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGPMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
VGPMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGPMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VSTCX vs. VGPMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Strategic Small-Cap Equity Fund (VSTCX) and Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund (VGPMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VSTCXVGPMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.69

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.44

5.25

+0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.17

21.90

-2.73

VSTCX vs. VGPMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VSTCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is lower than the VGPMX Sharpe Ratio of 4.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VSTCX and VGPMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VSTCXVGPMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.50

4.02

-1.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

1.19

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.55

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.26

+0.12

Drawdowns

VSTCX vs. VGPMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VSTCX drawdown since its inception was -62.50%, smaller than the maximum VGPMX drawdown of -78.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSTCX and VGPMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VSTCXVGPMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.50%

-78.85%

+16.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.08%

-12.80%

+4.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.47%

-14.63%

-12.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.47%

-22.71%

-4.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.08%

-54.59%

+6.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.65%

-34.55%

+23.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.29%

3.06%

-0.77%

Volatility

VSTCX vs. VGPMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Strategic Small-Cap Equity Fund (VSTCX) is 4.49%, while Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund (VGPMX) has a volatility of 5.98%. This indicates that VSTCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGPMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VSTCXVGPMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.49%

5.98%

-1.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.97%

13.83%

-1.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.57%

16.76%

+0.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.99%

17.38%

+4.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.47%

20.87%

+2.60%

VSTCX vs. VGPMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VSTCX has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is lower than VGPMX's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

VSTCX vs. VGPMX - Dividend Comparison

VSTCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.38%, more than VGPMX's 3.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VGPMX
Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund
3.22%2.59%2.68%3.22%3.27%3.26%2.03%2.39%3.02%0.02%1.72%2.32%
VSTCX
Vanguard Strategic Small-Cap Equity Fund
6.38%7.55%9.66%2.50%7.44%19.92%1.24%4.14%11.74%5.76%1.35%2.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


VSTCX and VGPMX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGPMX has higher volatility (5.98%) compared to VSTCX (4.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSTCX dropped -62.50% vs VGPMX's -78.85%.

VGPMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.02 vs 2.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VSTCX and VGPMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer