VST vs. VIK
VST (Vistra Corp.) and VIK (Viking Holdings Ltd) are both stocks. VST operates in Utilities - Independent Power Producers (Utilities), while VIK operates in Travel Services (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past year, VST returned -12.49% vs 103.52% for VIK. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
VST vs. VIK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VST achieves a 0.94% return, which is significantly lower than VIK's 41.65% return.
VST
- 1D
- -2.91%
- 1M
- 4.06%
- YTD
- 0.94%
- 6M
- 0.72%
- 1Y
- -12.49%
- 3Y*
- 88.21%
- 5Y*
- 57.72%
- 10Y*
- —
VIK
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- 20.09%
- YTD
- 41.65%
- 6M
- 38.35%
- 1Y
- 103.52%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VST vs. VIK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
VST Vistra Corp. | 0.94% | 17.66% | 82.99% |
VIK Viking Holdings Ltd | 41.65% | 62.07% | 68.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between VST and VIK is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2024 | 0.28 |
Fundamentals
VST:
$8.60
VIK:
$2.69
VST:
18.87
VIK:
37.59
VST:
0.43
VIK:
0.13
VST:
2.41
VIK:
6.77
VST:
$17.20B
VIK:
$6.66B
VST:
$1.12B
VIK:
$2.58B
VST:
$4.34B
VIK:
$1.74B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VST vs. VIK — Risk / Return Rank
VST
VIK
VST vs. VIK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vistra Corp. (VST) and Viking Holdings Ltd (VIK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VST | VIK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.42 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.33 | 6.97 | -7.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.59 | 19.28 | -19.87 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VST vs. VIK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VST drawdown since its inception was -53.32%, which is greater than VIK's maximum drawdown of -35.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VST and VIK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VST | VIK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.32% | -35.39% | -17.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.01% | -14.94% | -23.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.80% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.17% | 0.00% | -25.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.75% | -5.99% | -7.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.12% | 5.39% | +15.73% |
Volatility
VST vs. VIK - Volatility Comparison
Vistra Corp. (VST) has a higher volatility of 14.36% compared to Viking Holdings Ltd (VIK) at 10.18%. This indicates that VST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VST | VIK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.36% | 10.18% | +4.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.88% | 32.36% | +4.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.93% | 38.05% | +10.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.04% | 40.75% | +7.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.22% | 40.75% | +1.47% |
Dividends
VST vs. VIK - Dividend Comparison
VST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, while VIK has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIK Viking Holdings Ltd | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VST Vistra Corp. | 0.56% | 0.56% | 0.63% | 2.13% | 3.12% | 2.64% | 2.75% | 2.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 14.97% |
Financials
VST vs. VIK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Vistra Corp. and Viking Holdings Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
VST vs. VIK - Profitability Comparison
VST - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vistra Corp. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 5.64B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
VIK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Viking Holdings Ltd reported a gross profit of 284.28M and revenue of 1.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.0%.
VST - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vistra Corp. reported an operating income of 1.50B and revenue of 5.64B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.6%.
VIK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Viking Holdings Ltd reported an operating income of 12.06M and revenue of 1.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.1%.
VST - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vistra Corp. reported a net income of 980.00M and revenue of 5.64B, resulting in a net margin of 17.4%.
VIK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Viking Holdings Ltd reported a net income of -54.38M and revenue of 1.05B, resulting in a net margin of -5.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
VST and VIK have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VST has higher volatility (14.36%) compared to VIK (10.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VST dropped -53.32% vs VIK's -35.39%.
VIK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VST and VIK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer