VIK vs. IAS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Viking Holdings Ltd (VIK) and Integral Ad Science Holding Corp. (IAS).

Performance

VIK vs. IAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Viking Holdings Ltd (VIK) and Integral Ad Science Holding Corp. (IAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

VIK vs. IAS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
VIK Viking Holdings Ltd	2.90%	62.07%	68.81%
IAS Integral Ad Science Holding Corp.	0.00%	-0.96%	7.52%

Fundamentals

Market Cap VIK : $32.85B IAS : $1.76B
EPS VIK : $2.58 IAS : $0.28
PE Ratio VIK : 28.52 IAS : 37.31
PEG Ratio VIK : 0.10 IAS : 0.22
PS Ratio VIK : 5.03 IAS : 2.95
PB Ratio VIK : 29.30 IAS : 1.59
Total Revenue (TTM) VIK : $6.50B IAS : $590.67M
Gross Profit (TTM) VIK : $2.53B IAS : $457.31M
EBITDA (TTM) VIK : $1.79B IAS : $119.85M

Returns By Period

VIK

• 1D: 7.35%
• 1M: -5.82%
• YTD: 2.90%
• 6M: 18.21%
• 1Y: 84.86%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IAS

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

VIK vs. IAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VIK

VIK Risk / Return Rank: 91
VIK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
VIK Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
VIK Omega Ratio Rank: 87
VIK Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
VIK Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VIK vs. IAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Viking Holdings Ltd (VIK) and Integral Ad Science Holding Corp. (IAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VIK	IAS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.04	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.71	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.65	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	15.01	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VIK	IAS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.04	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.81	—	—

Correlation

The correlation between VIK and IAS is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

VIK vs. IAS - Dividend Comparison

Neither VIK nor IAS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	VIK	IAS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.39%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.66%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.82%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.34%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.78%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	VIK	IAS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.75%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.51%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	41.75%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.10%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.10%	—	—

Financials

VIK vs. IAS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Viking Holdings Ltd and Integral Ad Science Holding Corp. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

VIK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Viking Holdings Ltd reported a gross profit of 632.60M and revenue of 1.72B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.7%.

IAS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Integral Ad Science Holding Corp. reported a gross profit of 118.81M and revenue of 154.36M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 77.0%.

VIK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Viking Holdings Ltd reported an operating income of 360.56M and revenue of 1.72B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.9%.

IAS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Integral Ad Science Holding Corp. reported an operating income of 7.57M and revenue of 154.36M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.9%.

VIK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Viking Holdings Ltd reported a net income of 299.91M and revenue of 1.72B, resulting in a net margin of 17.4%.

IAS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Integral Ad Science Holding Corp. reported a net income of 7.05M and revenue of 154.36M, resulting in a net margin of 4.6%.