VSS vs. SCHP
VSS (Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF) and SCHP (Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VSS is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global Small Cap ex US Index, while SCHP is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VSS returned 8.49%/yr vs 2.60%/yr for SCHP. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VSS charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHP.
Performance
VSS vs. SCHP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VSS achieves a 10.04% return, which is significantly higher than SCHP's 1.42% return. Over the past 10 years, VSS has outperformed SCHP with an annualized return of 8.49%, while SCHP has yielded a comparatively lower 2.60% annualized return.
VSS
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -2.09%
- YTD
- 10.04%
- 6M
- 12.05%
- 1Y
- 23.45%
- 3Y*
- 15.73%
- 5Y*
- 5.58%
- 10Y*
- 8.49%
SCHP
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- YTD
- 1.42%
- 6M
- 1.48%
- 1Y
- 4.71%
- 3Y*
- 4.14%
- 5Y*
- 1.06%
- 10Y*
- 2.60%
VSS vs. SCHP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VSS Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF | 10.04% | 29.61% | 2.94% | 15.52% | -21.48% | 13.05% | 11.81% | 21.36% | -18.48% | 30.61% |
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 1.42% | 6.76% | 1.95% | 3.91% | -12.02% | 5.87% | 10.86% | 8.52% | -1.78% | 3.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between VSS and SCHP is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2010 | 0.02 |
Over the past year, VSS and SCHP have become more correlated (0.32) than their long-term average of 0.02, meaning their price movements have been converging.
VSS vs. SCHP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VSS
SCHP
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
-
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Industrials
VSS
SCHP
-
Technology
VSS
SCHP
-
Basic Materials
VSS
SCHP
-
Financial Services
VSS
SCHP
Consumer Cyclical
VSS
SCHP
Real Estate
VSS
SCHP
-
Healthcare
VSS
SCHP
-
Energy
VSS
SCHP
-
Consumer Defensive
VSS
SCHP
-
Utilities
VSS
SCHP
-
Communication Services
VSS
SCHP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VSS vs. SCHP — Risk / Return Rank
VSS
SCHP
VSS vs. SCHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS) and Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VSS | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.25 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.03 | 2.45 | -0.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.61 | 7.41 | +0.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VSS vs. SCHP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VSS drawdown since its inception was -43.51%, which is greater than SCHP's maximum drawdown of -14.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSS and SCHP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VSS | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.51% | -14.26% | -29.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.62% | -1.93% | -9.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.73% | -4.48% | -11.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.93% | -14.26% | -19.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.51% | -14.26% | -29.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.05% | -0.44% | -2.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.63% | -3.93% | -5.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.09% | 0.64% | +2.45% |
Volatility
VSS vs. SCHP - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS) has a higher volatility of 6.52% compared to Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF (SCHP) at 1.02%. This indicates that VSS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VSS | SCHP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.52% | 1.02% | +5.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.55% | 2.24% | +11.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.60% | 3.30% | +12.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.59% | 6.12% | +10.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.30% | 5.59% | +11.71% |
VSS vs. SCHP - Expense Ratio Comparison
VSS has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHP's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VSS vs. SCHP - Dividend Comparison
VSS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.08%, less than SCHP's 3.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHP Schwab U.S. TIPS ETF | 3.99% | 4.06% | 2.99% | 3.02% | 7.19% | 4.39% | 1.11% | 2.02% | 2.26% | 1.90% | 1.38% | 0.28% |
VSS Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF | 3.08% | 3.39% | 3.44% | 3.14% | 2.30% | 2.74% | 1.90% | 3.25% | 2.80% | 2.83% | 2.93% | 2.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VSS and SCHP have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VSS has higher volatility (6.52%) compared to SCHP (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSS dropped -43.51% vs SCHP's -14.26%.
On 10-year performance, VSS leads with 8.49% vs 2.60% for SCHP. On fees, SCHP is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHP has been the lower-risk option at 1.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VSS has performed better with a 8.49% return vs 2.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHP is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for VSS.
SCHP has the higher dividend yield at 3.99%, compared with 3.08% for VSS.
VSS is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while SCHP is Inflation-Protected Bonds. VSS tracks FTSE Global Small Cap ex US Index, while SCHP tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Linked Bond Index (Series-L). They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VSS and 0.03% for SCHP.
VSS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VSS and SCHP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer