PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VSS vs. META
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VSS vs. META - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VSS achieves a 10.04% return, which is significantly higher than META's -14.03% return. Over the past 10 years, VSS has underperformed META with an annualized return of 8.49%, while META has yielded a comparatively higher 17.39% annualized return.


VSS

1D
0.50%
1M
-2.16%
YTD
10.04%
6M
12.05%
1Y
24.95%
3Y*
15.73%
5Y*
5.58%
10Y*
8.49%

META

1D
-0.26%
1M
-7.69%
YTD
-14.03%
6M
-11.84%
1Y
-16.71%
3Y*
28.18%
5Y*
11.52%
10Y*
17.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VSS vs. META - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VSS
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF
10.04%29.61%2.94%15.52%-21.48%13.05%11.81%21.36%-18.48%30.61%
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
-14.03%13.09%66.05%194.13%-64.22%23.13%33.09%56.57%-25.71%53.38%

Correlation

The correlation between VSS and META is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2012

0.43

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VSS vs. META — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VSS
VSS Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
VSS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSS Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
VSS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSS Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

META
META Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
META Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
META Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
META Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
META Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
META Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VSS vs. META - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VSSMETADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

0.93

+0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.03

-0.54

+2.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.61

-1.12

+8.73

VSS vs. META - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VSS Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is higher than the META Sharpe Ratio of -0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VSS and META, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VSS vs. META - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VSS drawdown since its inception was -43.51%, smaller than the maximum META drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSS and META.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VSSMETADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.51%

-76.74%

+33.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.62%

-33.30%

+21.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.73%

-34.15%

+18.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.93%

-76.74%

+42.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.51%

-76.74%

+33.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.05%

-28.06%

+25.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.63%

-15.83%

+6.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

16.06%

-12.97%

Volatility

VSS vs. META - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS) is 6.52%, while Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) has a volatility of 10.17%. This indicates that VSS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than META based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VSSMETADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.52%

10.17%

-3.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.55%

26.91%

-13.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.60%

35.52%

-19.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.59%

44.04%

-27.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.30%

38.67%

-21.37%

Dividends

VSS vs. META - Dividend Comparison

VSS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.08%, more than META's 0.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
0.37%0.32%0.34%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VSS
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF
3.08%3.39%3.44%3.14%2.30%2.74%1.90%3.25%2.80%2.83%2.93%2.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


VSS and META have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

META has higher volatility (10.17%) compared to VSS (6.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSS dropped -43.51% vs META's -76.74%.

VSS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VSS and META

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer