VSS vs. EEMV

Last updated Jun 7, 2026

VSS (Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF) and EEMV (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VSS is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global Small Cap ex US Index, while EEMV is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VSS returned 7.63%/yr vs 5.93%/yr for EEMV. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VSS charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for EEMV.

Performance

VSS vs. EEMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VSS achieves a 7.72% return, which is significantly lower than EEMV's 11.74% return. Over the past 10 years, VSS has outperformed EEMV with an annualized return of 7.63%, while EEMV has yielded a comparatively lower 5.93% annualized return.

VSS

• 1D: -3.51%
• 1M: -3.65%
• YTD: 7.72%
• 6M: 9.95%
• 1Y: 22.81%
• 3Y*: 15.61%
• 5Y*: 5.20%
• 10Y*: 7.63%

EEMV

• 1D: -4.69%
• 1M: -0.97%
• YTD: 11.74%
• 6M: 12.18%
• 1Y: 18.83%
• 3Y*: 12.15%
• 5Y*: 4.50%
• 10Y*: 5.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VSS vs. EEMV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VSS Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF	7.72%	29.61%	2.94%	15.52%	-21.48%	13.05%	11.81%	21.36%	-18.48%	30.61%
EEMV iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF	11.74%	13.45%	7.98%	7.75%	-13.94%	5.05%	6.90%	7.83%	-5.81%	27.28%

Correlation

The correlation between VSS and EEMV is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.80
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2011	0.82

The correlation between VSS and EEMV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

VSS vs. EEMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VSS	EEMV
Industrials	18.7%	6.7%
Technology	13.3%	28.9%
Basic Materials	12.1%	3.1%
Financial Services	10.8%	17.7%
Consumer Cyclical	9.3%	5.0%
Real Estate	7.3%	0.5%
Healthcare	6.2%	6.2%
Energy	4.9%	3.4%
Consumer Defensive	3.4%	6.8%
Utilities	2.5%	4.6%
Communication Services	2.3%	11.2%

Return for Risk

VSS vs. EEMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VSS

VSS Risk / Return Rank: 44
VSS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
VSS Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
VSS Omega Ratio Rank: 45
VSS Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
VSS Martin Ratio Rank: 47

EEMV

EEMV Risk / Return Rank: 44
EEMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
EEMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
EEMV Omega Ratio Rank: 47
EEMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
EEMV Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VSS vs. EEMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VSS	EEMV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	1.40	+0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.08	1.93	+0.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.28	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.99	2.11	-0.12
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.64	7.76	-0.12
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VSS vs. EEMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VSS Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the EEMV Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VSS and EEMV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VSS	EEMV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.52	1.40	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32	0.37	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.44	0.43	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.54	0.36	+0.17

Drawdowns

VSS vs. EEMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VSS drawdown since its inception was -43.51%, which is greater than EEMV's maximum drawdown of -31.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSS and EEMV.

Drawdown Indicators

	VSS	EEMV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.51%	-31.56%	-11.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.62%	-9.22%	-2.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.73%	-12.47%	-3.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.93%	-21.90%	-12.03%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.51%	-31.56%	-11.95%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.10%	-6.11%	+1.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.64%	-7.97%	-1.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.02%	2.50%	+0.52%

Volatility

VSS vs. EEMV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS) is 5.93%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) has a volatility of 7.28%. This indicates that VSS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VSS	EEMV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.93%	7.28%	-1.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.18%	12.72%	+0.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.25%	13.92%	+1.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.53%	12.03%	+4.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.30%	13.93%	+3.37%

VSS vs. EEMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VSS has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than EEMV's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

VSS vs. EEMV - Dividend Comparison

VSS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, more than EEMV's 2.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EEMV iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF	2.37%	2.65%	3.50%	2.75%	1.93%	2.14%	2.45%	2.63%	2.46%	2.34%	2.79%	2.55%
VSS Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF	3.15%	3.39%	3.44%	3.14%	2.30%	2.74%	1.90%	3.25%	2.80%	2.83%	2.93%	2.66%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VSS and EEMV in my portfolio?

VSS and EEMV have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VSS or EEMV?

EEMV has higher volatility (7.28%) compared to VSS (5.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSS dropped -43.51% vs EEMV's -31.56%.

Which ETF is better, VSS or EEMV?

On 10-year performance, VSS leads with 7.63% vs 5.93% for EEMV. On fees, VSS is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, VSS has been the lower-risk option at 5.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VSS or EEMV?

Over the 10-year period, VSS has performed better with a 7.63% return vs 5.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VSS or EEMV?

VSS is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for EEMV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VSS or EEMV?

VSS has the higher dividend yield at 3.15%, compared with 2.37% for EEMV.

What is the main difference between VSS and EEMV?

VSS is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while EEMV is Asia Pacific Equities. VSS tracks FTSE Global Small Cap ex US Index, while EEMV tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VSS and 0.25% for EEMV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VSS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.