VSS vs. DFEV
VSS (Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF) and DFEV (Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VSS is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global Small Cap ex US Index, while DFEV is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by Dimensional. VSS is passively managed, while DFEV is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, VSS returned 16.67%/yr vs 25.84%/yr for DFEV. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VSS charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for DFEV.
Performance
VSS vs. DFEV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VSS achieves a 10.57% return, which is significantly lower than DFEV's 29.46% return.
VSS
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- 1.27%
- YTD
- 10.57%
- 6M
- 13.10%
- 1Y
- 27.32%
- 3Y*
- 16.67%
- 5Y*
- 5.76%
- 10Y*
- 8.07%
DFEV
- 1D
- -1.36%
- 1M
- 9.10%
- YTD
- 29.46%
- 6M
- 32.40%
- 1Y
- 57.15%
- 3Y*
- 25.84%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VSS vs. DFEV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VSS Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF | 10.57% | 29.61% | 2.94% | 15.52% | -7.95% |
DFEV Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF | 29.46% | 32.54% | 7.26% | 15.52% | -6.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between VSS and DFEV is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2022 | 0.84 |
The correlation between VSS and DFEV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
VSS vs. DFEV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VSS
DFEV
Industrials
Technology
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
VSS
DFEV
Technology
VSS
DFEV
Basic Materials
VSS
DFEV
Financial Services
VSS
DFEV
Consumer Cyclical
VSS
DFEV
Real Estate
VSS
DFEV
Healthcare
VSS
DFEV
Energy
VSS
DFEV
Consumer Defensive
VSS
DFEV
Utilities
VSS
DFEV
Communication Services
VSS
DFEV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VSS vs. DFEV — Risk / Return Rank
VSS
DFEV
VSS vs. DFEV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS) and Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF (DFEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VSS | DFEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.61 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.36 | 5.06 | -2.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.13 | 19.06 | -9.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VSS | DFEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.85 | 3.32 | -1.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 1.11 | -0.57 |
Drawdowns
VSS vs. DFEV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VSS drawdown since its inception was -43.51%, which is greater than DFEV's maximum drawdown of -18.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSS and DFEV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VSS | DFEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.51% | -18.49% | -25.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.62% | -11.35% | -0.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.73% | -17.94% | +2.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.93% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.58% | -1.36% | -1.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.64% | -4.65% | -4.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.00% | 3.01% | -0.01% |
Volatility
VSS vs. DFEV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS) is 5.33%, while Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF (DFEV) has a volatility of 7.73%. This indicates that VSS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFEV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VSS | DFEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.33% | 7.73% | -2.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.64% | 14.85% | -2.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.81% | 17.31% | -2.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.46% | 16.42% | +0.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.27% | 16.42% | +0.85% |
VSS vs. DFEV - Expense Ratio Comparison
VSS has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than DFEV's 0.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
VSS vs. DFEV - Dividend Comparison
VSS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.07%, more than DFEV's 2.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFEV Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF | 2.02% | 2.69% | 3.17% | 3.47% | 3.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VSS Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF | 3.07% | 3.39% | 3.44% | 3.14% | 2.30% | 2.74% | 1.90% | 3.25% | 2.80% | 2.83% | 2.93% | 2.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VSS and DFEV have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DFEV has higher volatility (7.73%) compared to VSS (5.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSS dropped -43.51% vs DFEV's -18.49%.
On 3-year performance, DFEV leads with 25.84% vs 16.67% for VSS. On fees, VSS is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, VSS has been the lower-risk option at 5.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DFEV has performed better with a 25.84% return vs 16.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VSS is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for DFEV.
VSS has the higher dividend yield at 3.07%, compared with 2.02% for DFEV.
VSS is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while DFEV is Emerging Markets Diversified. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VSS and 0.43% for DFEV.
DFEV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.32 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VSS and DFEV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer