VSMV vs. TAIL
VSMV (VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF) and TAIL (Cambria Tail Risk ETF) are both Volatility Hedged Equity funds. VSMV is passively managed, while TAIL is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, VSMV returned 11.35%/yr vs -8.38%/yr for TAIL. At a correlation of -0.54, they often move in opposite directions. VSMV charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for TAIL.
Performance
VSMV vs. TAIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VSMV achieves a 9.29% return, which is significantly higher than TAIL's -6.17% return.
VSMV
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 2.75%
- YTD
- 9.29%
- 6M
- 9.79%
- 1Y
- 24.46%
- 3Y*
- 16.84%
- 5Y*
- 11.35%
- 10Y*
- —
TAIL
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -2.15%
- YTD
- -6.17%
- 6M
- -7.55%
- 1Y
- -8.73%
- 3Y*
- -5.76%
- 5Y*
- -8.38%
- 10Y*
- —
VSMV vs. TAIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VSMV VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF | 9.29% | 16.77% | 15.79% | 12.34% | -7.56% | 25.66% | 5.05% | 26.79% | -1.12% | 11.48% |
TAIL Cambria Tail Risk ETF | -6.17% | 5.48% | -9.62% | -13.29% | -13.13% | -12.81% | 6.91% | -14.27% | 2.85% | -7.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between VSMV and TAIL is -0.43, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2017 | -0.54 |
The correlation between VSMV and TAIL shifts across timeframes, from -0.54 (all time) to -0.40 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VSMV vs. TAIL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VSMV
TAIL
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
VSMV
TAIL
Consumer Defensive
VSMV
TAIL
Healthcare
VSMV
TAIL
Industrials
VSMV
TAIL
Financial Services
VSMV
TAIL
Communication Services
VSMV
TAIL
Consumer Cyclical
VSMV
TAIL
Energy
VSMV
TAIL
Basic Materials
VSMV
TAIL
Real Estate
VSMV
TAIL
Utilities
VSMV
TAIL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VSMV vs. TAIL — Risk / Return Rank
VSMV
TAIL
VSMV vs. TAIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV) and Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VSMV | TAIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.71 | -1.03 | +3.74 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.03 | -1.46 | +5.49 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 0.83 | +0.66 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.74 | -0.80 | +5.54 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.09 | -2.01 | +20.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VSMV | TAIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.71 | -1.03 | +3.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 | -0.57 | +1.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | -0.48 | +1.31 |
Drawdowns
VSMV vs. TAIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VSMV drawdown since its inception was -31.33%, smaller than the maximum TAIL drawdown of -52.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSMV and TAIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VSMV | TAIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.33% | -52.36% | +21.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.18% | -10.95% | +5.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.22% | -20.65% | +7.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.96% | -38.44% | +20.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.79% | -51.56% | +50.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.41% | -29.12% | +25.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.36% | 4.35% | -2.99% |
Volatility
VSMV vs. TAIL - Volatility Comparison
VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV) has a higher volatility of 2.41% compared to Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL) at 0.86%. This indicates that VSMV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TAIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VSMV | TAIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.41% | 0.86% | +1.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.34% | 6.45% | -0.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.08% | 8.51% | +0.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.86% | 14.90% | -2.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.04% | 14.94% | +0.10% |
VSMV vs. TAIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
VSMV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than TAIL's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
VSMV vs. TAIL - Dividend Comparison
VSMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, less than TAIL's 3.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TAIL Cambria Tail Risk ETF | 3.49% | 2.88% | 3.48% | 3.74% | 1.50% | 0.49% | 0.36% | 1.58% | 1.52% | 0.91% |
VSMV VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF | 1.31% | 1.35% | 1.36% | 1.77% | 1.99% | 1.36% | 2.01% | 2.00% | 2.42% | 1.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VSMV and TAIL have a correlation of -0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VSMV has higher volatility (2.41%) compared to TAIL (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSMV dropped -31.33% vs TAIL's -52.36%.
On 5-year performance, VSMV leads with 11.35% vs -8.38% for TAIL. On fees, VSMV is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, TAIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VSMV has performed better with a 11.35% return vs -8.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VSMV is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for TAIL.
TAIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.49%, compared with 1.31% for VSMV.
They also come from different issuers: Crestview and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for VSMV and 0.59% for TAIL.
VSMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VSMV and TAIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer