PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VSMV vs. TAIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VSMV vs. TAIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV) and Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VSMV achieves a 9.29% return, which is significantly higher than TAIL's -6.17% return.


VSMV

1D
0.33%
1M
2.75%
YTD
9.29%
6M
9.79%
1Y
24.46%
3Y*
16.84%
5Y*
11.35%
10Y*

TAIL

1D
-0.05%
1M
-2.15%
YTD
-6.17%
6M
-7.55%
1Y
-8.73%
3Y*
-5.76%
5Y*
-8.38%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VSMV vs. TAIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VSMV
VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF
9.29%16.77%15.79%12.34%-7.56%25.66%5.05%26.79%-1.12%11.48%
TAIL
Cambria Tail Risk ETF
-6.17%5.48%-9.62%-13.29%-13.13%-12.81%6.91%-14.27%2.85%-7.92%

Correlation

The correlation between VSMV and TAIL is -0.43, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2017

-0.54

The correlation between VSMV and TAIL shifts across timeframes, from -0.54 (all time) to -0.40 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VSMV vs. TAIL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VSMV
TAIL

Technology

34.4%
35.6%

Consumer Defensive

17.6%
4.9%

Healthcare

14.8%
8.5%

Industrials

8.5%
8.3%

Financial Services

8.1%
11.8%

Communication Services

5.4%
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

5.0%
10.1%

Energy

4.4%
3.5%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.8%

Real Estate

0.0%
1.9%

Utilities

0.0%
2.4%

Technology

VSMV
34.4%
TAIL
35.6%

Consumer Defensive

VSMV
17.6%
TAIL
4.9%

Healthcare

VSMV
14.8%
TAIL
8.5%

Industrials

VSMV
8.5%
TAIL
8.3%

Financial Services

VSMV
8.1%
TAIL
11.8%

Communication Services

VSMV
5.4%
TAIL
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

VSMV
5.0%
TAIL
10.1%

Energy

VSMV
4.4%
TAIL
3.5%

Basic Materials

VSMV
1.8%
TAIL
1.8%

Real Estate

VSMV
0.0%
TAIL
1.9%

Utilities

VSMV
0.0%
TAIL
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VSMV vs. TAIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VSMV
VSMV Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
VSMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSMV Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
VSMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSMV Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

TAIL
TAIL Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
TAIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAIL Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
TAIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAIL Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VSMV vs. TAIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV) and Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VSMVTAILDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.71

-1.03

+3.74

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.03

-1.46

+5.49

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

0.83

+0.66

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.74

-0.80

+5.54

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.09

-2.01

+20.10

VSMV vs. TAIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VSMV Sharpe Ratio is 2.71, which is higher than the TAIL Sharpe Ratio of -1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VSMV and TAIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VSMVTAILDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.71

-1.03

+3.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

-0.57

+1.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

-0.48

+1.31

Drawdowns

VSMV vs. TAIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VSMV drawdown since its inception was -31.33%, smaller than the maximum TAIL drawdown of -52.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSMV and TAIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VSMVTAILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.33%

-52.36%

+21.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.18%

-10.95%

+5.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.22%

-20.65%

+7.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.96%

-38.44%

+20.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.79%

-51.56%

+50.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.41%

-29.12%

+25.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.36%

4.35%

-2.99%

Volatility

VSMV vs. TAIL - Volatility Comparison

VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV) has a higher volatility of 2.41% compared to Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL) at 0.86%. This indicates that VSMV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TAIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VSMVTAILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.41%

0.86%

+1.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.34%

6.45%

-0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.08%

8.51%

+0.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.86%

14.90%

-2.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.04%

14.94%

+0.10%

VSMV vs. TAIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

VSMV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than TAIL's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

VSMV vs. TAIL - Dividend Comparison

VSMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, less than TAIL's 3.49% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
TAIL
Cambria Tail Risk ETF
3.49%2.88%3.48%3.74%1.50%0.49%0.36%1.58%1.52%0.91%
VSMV
VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF
1.31%1.35%1.36%1.77%1.99%1.36%2.01%2.00%2.42%1.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


VSMV and TAIL have a correlation of -0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VSMV has higher volatility (2.41%) compared to TAIL (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSMV dropped -31.33% vs TAIL's -52.36%.

On 5-year performance, VSMV leads with 11.35% vs -8.38% for TAIL. On fees, VSMV is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, TAIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VSMV has performed better with a 11.35% return vs -8.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VSMV is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for TAIL.

TAIL has the higher dividend yield at 3.49%, compared with 1.31% for VSMV.

They also come from different issuers: Crestview and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for VSMV and 0.59% for TAIL.

VSMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VSMV and TAIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer