PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VSMV vs. FLLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VSMV vs. FLLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV) and Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF (FLLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VSMV achieves a 9.29% return, which is significantly lower than FLLV's 13.04% return.


VSMV

1D
0.33%
1M
2.75%
YTD
9.29%
6M
9.79%
1Y
24.46%
3Y*
16.84%
5Y*
11.35%
10Y*

FLLV

1D
-0.76%
1M
2.34%
YTD
13.04%
6M
14.26%
1Y
26.92%
3Y*
17.11%
5Y*
11.11%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VSMV vs. FLLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VSMV
VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF
9.29%16.77%15.79%12.34%-7.56%25.66%5.05%26.79%-1.12%11.48%
FLLV
Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF
13.04%15.92%10.70%13.87%-8.54%23.36%12.33%32.72%-2.14%8.79%

Correlation

The correlation between VSMV and FLLV is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2017

0.80

The correlation between VSMV and FLLV shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.84 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VSMV vs. FLLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VSMV
FLLV

Technology

34.4%
28.8%

Consumer Defensive

17.6%
6.1%

Healthcare

14.8%
11.6%

Industrials

8.5%
9.6%

Financial Services

8.1%
13.0%

Communication Services

5.4%
7.8%

Consumer Cyclical

5.0%
11.0%

Energy

4.4%
4.4%

Basic Materials

1.8%
2.7%

Real Estate

0.0%
2.5%

Utilities

0.0%
2.6%

Technology

VSMV
34.4%
FLLV
28.8%

Consumer Defensive

VSMV
17.6%
FLLV
6.1%

Healthcare

VSMV
14.8%
FLLV
11.6%

Industrials

VSMV
8.5%
FLLV
9.6%

Financial Services

VSMV
8.1%
FLLV
13.0%

Communication Services

VSMV
5.4%
FLLV
7.8%

Consumer Cyclical

VSMV
5.0%
FLLV
11.0%

Energy

VSMV
4.4%
FLLV
4.4%

Basic Materials

VSMV
1.8%
FLLV
2.7%

Real Estate

VSMV
0.0%
FLLV
2.5%

Utilities

VSMV
0.0%
FLLV
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VSMV vs. FLLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VSMV
VSMV Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
VSMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSMV Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
VSMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSMV Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

FLLV
FLLV Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
FLLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLLV Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
FLLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLLV Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VSMV vs. FLLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV) and Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF (FLLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VSMVFLLVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.71

3.26

-0.55

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.03

4.73

-0.71

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.61

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.74

5.52

-0.78

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.09

20.83

-2.74

VSMV vs. FLLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VSMV Sharpe Ratio is 2.71, which is comparable to the FLLV Sharpe Ratio of 3.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VSMV and FLLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VSMVFLLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.71

3.26

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

0.84

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.84

-0.01

Drawdowns

VSMV vs. FLLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VSMV drawdown since its inception was -31.33%, smaller than the maximum FLLV drawdown of -33.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSMV and FLLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VSMVFLLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.33%

-33.95%

+2.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.18%

-4.90%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.22%

-14.01%

+0.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.96%

-18.40%

+0.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.79%

-0.76%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.41%

-3.25%

-0.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.36%

1.30%

+0.06%

Volatility

VSMV vs. FLLV - Volatility Comparison

VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV) has a higher volatility of 2.41% compared to Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF (FLLV) at 2.02%. This indicates that VSMV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VSMVFLLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.41%

2.02%

+0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.34%

5.96%

+0.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.08%

8.32%

+0.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.86%

13.27%

-0.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.04%

15.69%

-0.65%

VSMV vs. FLLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VSMV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FLLV's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

VSMV vs. FLLV - Dividend Comparison

VSMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.31%, less than FLLV's 4.73% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FLLV
Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF
4.73%4.71%3.25%1.75%1.68%1.41%1.40%1.31%1.55%1.44%0.50%
VSMV
VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF
1.31%1.35%1.36%1.77%1.99%1.36%2.01%2.00%2.42%1.11%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VSMV and FLLV have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VSMV has higher volatility (2.41%) compared to FLLV (2.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSMV dropped -31.33% vs FLLV's -33.95%.

On 5-year performance, VSMV leads with 11.35% vs 11.11% for FLLV. On fees, FLLV is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FLLV has been the lower-risk option at 2.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VSMV has performed better with a 11.35% return vs 11.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FLLV is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for VSMV.

FLLV has the higher dividend yield at 4.73%, compared with 1.31% for VSMV.

They also come from different issuers: Crestview and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for VSMV and 0.29% for FLLV.

FLLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.26 vs 2.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VSMV and FLLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer