PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VSFAX vs. FIHBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VSFAX vs. FIHBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Clover Small Value Fund (VSFAX) and Federated Hermes Institutional High Yield Bond Fund (FIHBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VSFAX achieves a 12.27% return, which is significantly higher than FIHBX's 1.16% return. Over the past 10 years, VSFAX has outperformed FIHBX with an annualized return of 10.31%, while FIHBX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.04% annualized return.


VSFAX

1D
-1.22%
1M
1.44%
YTD
12.27%
6M
11.13%
1Y
27.29%
3Y*
17.41%
5Y*
8.24%
10Y*
10.31%

FIHBX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.38%
YTD
1.16%
6M
1.90%
1Y
6.38%
3Y*
8.28%
5Y*
3.45%
10Y*
5.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VSFAX vs. FIHBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VSFAX
Federated Hermes Clover Small Value Fund
12.27%7.53%20.49%10.43%-8.82%30.14%9.13%19.67%-18.43%12.06%
FIHBX
Federated Hermes Institutional High Yield Bond Fund
1.16%8.59%6.40%13.17%-12.64%3.92%5.99%15.01%-2.80%7.19%

Correlation

The correlation between VSFAX and FIHBX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2002

0.32

The correlation between VSFAX and FIHBX shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (all time) to 0.51 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VSFAX vs. FIHBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VSFAX
VSFAX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
VSFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
VSFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

FIHBX
FIHBX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FIHBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIHBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIHBX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FIHBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIHBX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VSFAX vs. FIHBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Clover Small Value Fund (VSFAX) and Federated Hermes Institutional High Yield Bond Fund (FIHBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VSFAXFIHBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.50

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.03

2.66

+0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.09

14.04

-3.95

VSFAX vs. FIHBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VSFAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the FIHBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VSFAX and FIHBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VSFAXFIHBXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

1.92

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.67

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

0.88

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

1.36

-1.11

Drawdowns

VSFAX vs. FIHBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VSFAX drawdown since its inception was -78.14%, which is greater than FIHBX's maximum drawdown of -31.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSFAX and FIHBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VSFAXFIHBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.14%

-31.05%

-47.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.67%

-2.45%

-7.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.07%

-3.60%

-26.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.07%

-16.35%

-13.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.57%

-21.67%

-26.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.22%

-0.11%

-1.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.85%

-2.30%

-18.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

0.46%

+2.44%

Volatility

VSFAX vs. FIHBX - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes Clover Small Value Fund (VSFAX) has a higher volatility of 5.07% compared to Federated Hermes Institutional High Yield Bond Fund (FIHBX) at 1.06%. This indicates that VSFAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIHBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VSFAXFIHBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.07%

1.06%

+4.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.45%

2.73%

+9.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.80%

3.39%

+14.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.33%

5.19%

+18.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.06%

5.76%

+18.30%

VSFAX vs. FIHBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VSFAX has a 1.14% expense ratio, which is higher than FIHBX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

VSFAX vs. FIHBX - Dividend Comparison

VSFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.07%, less than FIHBX's 6.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIHBX
Federated Hermes Institutional High Yield Bond Fund
6.45%6.29%5.94%5.93%4.58%4.25%5.14%5.79%6.24%5.55%5.75%6.46%
VSFAX
Federated Hermes Clover Small Value Fund
3.07%3.45%20.39%2.91%9.15%8.62%0.11%0.35%23.83%16.53%2.33%2.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


VSFAX and FIHBX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VSFAX has higher volatility (5.07%) compared to FIHBX (1.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSFAX dropped -78.14% vs FIHBX's -31.05%.

FIHBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VSFAX and FIHBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer