PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VSDA vs. ILCG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VSDA vs. ILCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF (VSDA) and iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VSDA achieves a 4.72% return, which is significantly lower than ILCG's 14.48% return.


VSDA

1D
0.04%
1M
0.21%
YTD
4.72%
6M
4.63%
1Y
10.40%
3Y*
9.81%
5Y*
6.69%
10Y*

ILCG

1D
-1.02%
1M
7.68%
YTD
14.48%
6M
14.61%
1Y
29.51%
3Y*
26.55%
5Y*
14.95%
10Y*
18.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VSDA vs. ILCG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VSDA
VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF
4.72%6.67%9.40%8.74%-4.42%21.95%12.72%31.39%-1.40%14.27%
ILCG
iShares Morningstar Growth ETF
14.48%16.71%32.82%40.41%-31.75%24.33%38.56%33.22%2.06%19.81%

Correlation

The correlation between VSDA and ILCG is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2017

0.54

Over the past year, the correlation between VSDA and ILCG has dropped to 0.24 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VSDA vs. ILCG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VSDA
ILCG

Consumer Defensive

31.5%
1.6%

Financial Services

21.0%
6.0%

Industrials

16.8%
8.3%

Basic Materials

8.0%
1.1%

Healthcare

7.6%
5.3%

Consumer Cyclical

5.1%
10.6%

Technology

4.7%
49.8%

Utilities

2.7%
0.8%

Energy

2.5%
0.5%

Communication Services

0.1%
14.5%

Real Estate

0.0%
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

VSDA
31.5%
ILCG
1.6%

Financial Services

VSDA
21.0%
ILCG
6.0%

Industrials

VSDA
16.8%
ILCG
8.3%

Basic Materials

VSDA
8.0%
ILCG
1.1%

Healthcare

VSDA
7.6%
ILCG
5.3%

Consumer Cyclical

VSDA
5.1%
ILCG
10.6%

Technology

VSDA
4.7%
ILCG
49.8%

Utilities

VSDA
2.7%
ILCG
0.8%

Energy

VSDA
2.5%
ILCG
0.5%

Communication Services

VSDA
0.1%
ILCG
14.5%

Real Estate

VSDA
0.0%
ILCG
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VSDA vs. ILCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VSDA
VSDA Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
VSDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSDA Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
VSDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSDA Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

ILCG
ILCG Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
ILCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ILCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
ILCG Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
ILCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
ILCG Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VSDA vs. ILCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF (VSDA) and iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VSDAILCGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.32

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

1.89

-0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.84

6.68

-3.83

VSDA vs. ILCG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VSDA Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is lower than the ILCG Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VSDA and ILCG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VSDAILCGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

1.82

-0.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.68

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.59

+0.08

Drawdowns

VSDA vs. ILCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VSDA drawdown since its inception was -32.12%, smaller than the maximum ILCG drawdown of -52.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSDA and ILCG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VSDAILCGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.12%

-52.98%

+20.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.44%

-15.65%

+6.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.54%

-23.10%

+7.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.14%

-35.38%

+19.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.28%

-1.02%

-5.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.64%

-8.22%

+4.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.67%

4.43%

-0.76%

Volatility

VSDA vs. ILCG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF (VSDA) is 2.84%, while iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG) has a volatility of 4.40%. This indicates that VSDA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ILCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VSDAILCGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.84%

4.40%

-1.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.12%

12.81%

-4.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.23%

16.31%

-5.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.03%

22.00%

-7.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.59%

21.53%

-4.94%

VSDA vs. ILCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

VSDA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

VSDA vs. ILCG - Dividend Comparison

VSDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, more than ILCG's 0.40% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ILCG
iShares Morningstar Growth ETF
0.40%0.47%0.50%0.69%0.75%0.34%0.28%0.54%0.81%0.89%0.95%0.99%
VSDA
VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF
2.61%2.65%2.36%1.92%1.83%1.40%1.49%1.36%1.69%1.23%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VSDA and ILCG have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ILCG has higher volatility (4.40%) compared to VSDA (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSDA dropped -32.12% vs ILCG's -52.98%.

On 5-year performance, ILCG leads with 14.95% vs 6.69% for VSDA. On fees, ILCG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VSDA has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ILCG has performed better with a 14.95% return vs 6.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ILCG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for VSDA.

VSDA has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 0.40% for ILCG.

VSDA tracks Nasdaq Victory Dividend Accelerator Index, while ILCG tracks Morningstar US Large-Mid Cap Broad Growth Index Gross. They also come from different issuers: Crestview and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for VSDA and 0.04% for ILCG.

ILCG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VSDA and ILCG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer