PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VRTTX vs. HFCSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VRTTX vs. HFCSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 3000 Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTTX) and Hennessy Focus Fund (HFCSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VRTTX achieves a 11.70% return, which is significantly lower than HFCSX's 13.28% return. Over the past 10 years, VRTTX has outperformed HFCSX with an annualized return of 15.04%, while HFCSX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.15% annualized return.


VRTTX

1D
0.22%
1M
5.68%
YTD
11.70%
6M
11.59%
1Y
28.61%
3Y*
22.07%
5Y*
12.93%
10Y*
15.04%

HFCSX

1D
3.17%
1M
15.73%
YTD
13.28%
6M
17.94%
1Y
48.78%
3Y*
23.79%
5Y*
10.91%
10Y*
12.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VRTTX vs. HFCSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VRTTX
Vanguard Russell 3000 Index Fund Institutional Shares
11.70%16.70%23.72%25.92%-19.27%25.48%20.81%31.03%-5.29%21.02%
HFCSX
Hennessy Focus Fund
13.28%28.30%14.67%20.99%-24.92%32.04%5.47%34.96%-10.93%19.27%

Correlation

The correlation between VRTTX and HFCSX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2010

0.83

Over the past year, the correlation between VRTTX and HFCSX has dropped to 0.57 - well below their long-term average of 0.83, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VRTTX vs. HFCSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VRTTX
VRTTX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VRTTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRTTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRTTX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
VRTTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRTTX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

HFCSX
HFCSX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
HFCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
HFCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VRTTX vs. HFCSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 3000 Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTTX) and Hennessy Focus Fund (HFCSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VRTTXHFCSXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.43

1.78

+0.65

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.32

2.44

+0.88

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.29

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.34

2.59

+0.75

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.35

5.92

+9.44

VRTTX vs. HFCSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VRTTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is higher than the HFCSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VRTTX and HFCSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VRTTXHFCSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.43

1.78

+0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.48

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

0.54

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.46

+0.37

Drawdowns

VRTTX vs. HFCSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VRTTX drawdown since its inception was -34.96%, smaller than the maximum HFCSX drawdown of -59.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRTTX and HFCSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VRTTXHFCSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.96%

-59.41%

+24.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.87%

-19.90%

+11.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.56%

-23.02%

+3.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.13%

-33.13%

+8.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.96%

-47.07%

+12.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.57%

+2.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.04%

-9.86%

+5.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

8.69%

-6.77%

Volatility

VRTTX vs. HFCSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Russell 3000 Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTTX) is 2.95%, while Hennessy Focus Fund (HFCSX) has a volatility of 10.19%. This indicates that VRTTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HFCSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VRTTXHFCSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.95%

10.19%

-7.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.16%

20.75%

-11.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.16%

28.96%

-16.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.36%

22.85%

-5.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.42%

22.62%

-4.20%

VRTTX vs. HFCSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VRTTX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than HFCSX's 1.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

VRTTX vs. HFCSX - Dividend Comparison

VRTTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than HFCSX's 42.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HFCSX
Hennessy Focus Fund
42.78%48.46%15.94%24.51%15.15%17.19%35.80%10.78%22.20%0.01%0.00%0.20%
VRTTX
Vanguard Russell 3000 Index Fund Institutional Shares
1.00%0.82%1.20%1.49%1.54%1.12%1.38%1.72%1.96%1.69%1.89%1.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


VRTTX and HFCSX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HFCSX has higher volatility (10.19%) compared to VRTTX (2.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VRTTX dropped -34.96% vs HFCSX's -59.41%.

VRTTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VRTTX and HFCSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer