HFCSX vs. HFLGX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

HFCSX (Hennessy Focus Fund) and HFLGX (Hennessy Cornerstone Large Cap Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - HFCSX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Hennessy, while HFLGX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by Hennessy. Over the past 10 years, HFCSX returned 11.76%/yr vs 11.71%/yr for HFLGX. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. HFCSX charges 1.49%/yr vs 1.29%/yr for HFLGX.

Performance

HFCSX vs. HFLGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hennessy Focus Fund (HFCSX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Large Cap Growth Fund (HFLGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with HFCSX having a 7.82% return and HFLGX slightly higher at 8.04%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with HFCSX having a 11.76% annualized return and HFLGX not far behind at 11.71%.

HFCSX

• 1D: -0.45%
• 1M: -0.40%
• YTD: 7.82%
• 6M: 3.98%
• 1Y: 24.60%
• 3Y*: 19.84%
• 5Y*: 10.21%
• 10Y*: 11.76%

HFLGX

• 1D: -0.57%
• 1M: 0.74%
• YTD: 8.04%
• 6M: 6.84%
• 1Y: 14.50%
• 3Y*: 10.55%
• 5Y*: 7.27%
• 10Y*: 11.71%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HFCSX vs. HFLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
HFCSX Hennessy Focus Fund	7.82%	28.30%	14.67%	20.99%	-24.92%	32.04%	5.47%	34.96%	-10.93%	19.27%
HFLGX Hennessy Cornerstone Large Cap Growth Fund	8.04%	7.40%	4.38%	21.74%	-13.23%	34.89%	5.49%	27.53%	-9.58%	17.10%

Correlation

The correlation between HFCSX and HFLGX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.65
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.74
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2009	0.80

Over the past year, the correlation between HFCSX and HFLGX has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.80, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

HFCSX vs. HFLGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HFCSX

HFCSX Risk / Return Rank: 13
HFCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
HFCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
HFCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 12
HFCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
HFCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 11

HFLGX

HFLGX Risk / Return Rank: 25
HFLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
HFLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
HFLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 20
HFLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
HFLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HFCSX vs. HFLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hennessy Focus Fund (HFCSX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Large Cap Growth Fund (HFLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	HFCSX	HFLGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.90	1.26	-0.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.42	1.89	-0.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.22	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.33	2.09	-0.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.99	5.55	-2.56

HFCSX vs. HFLGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HFCSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is comparable to the HFLGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HFCSX and HFLGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

HFCSX vs. HFLGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HFCSX drawdown since its inception was -59.41%, which is greater than HFLGX's maximum drawdown of -38.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFCSX and HFLGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	HFCSX	HFLGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.41%	-38.90%	-20.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.90%	-7.18%	-12.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.02%	-19.50%	-3.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.13%	-25.67%	-7.46%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.07%	-38.90%	-8.17%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.26%	-2.47%	-4.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.85%	-4.89%	-4.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.81%	2.69%	+6.12%

Volatility

HFCSX vs. HFLGX - Volatility Comparison

Hennessy Focus Fund (HFCSX) has a higher volatility of 11.05% compared to Hennessy Cornerstone Large Cap Growth Fund (HFLGX) at 3.80%. This indicates that HFCSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HFLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HFCSX	HFLGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.05%	3.80%	+7.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.28%	8.74%	+12.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.51%	11.91%	+17.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.06%	17.21%	+5.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.72%	18.87%	+3.85%

HFCSX vs. HFLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HFCSX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than HFLGX's 1.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

HFCSX vs. HFLGX - Dividend Comparison

HFCSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.94%, more than HFLGX's 5.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HFCSX Hennessy Focus Fund	44.94%	48.46%	15.94%	24.51%	15.15%	17.19%	35.80%	10.78%	22.20%	0.01%	0.00%	0.20%
HFLGX Hennessy Cornerstone Large Cap Growth Fund	5.61%	6.07%	4.44%	3.74%	19.36%	14.30%	5.26%	2.43%	26.78%	4.11%	7.15%	30.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both HFCSX and HFLGX in my portfolio?

HFCSX and HFLGX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, HFCSX or HFLGX?

HFCSX has higher volatility (11.05%) compared to HFLGX (3.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HFCSX dropped -59.41% vs HFLGX's -38.90%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HFLGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.26 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.