HFCSX vs. CTIGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Hennessy Focus Fund (HFCSX) and Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund (CTIGX).
HFCSX is managed by Hennessy. It was launched on Jan 3, 1997. CTIGX is managed by Calamos. It was launched on Jul 31, 2019.
Performance
HFCSX vs. CTIGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
HFCSX vs. CTIGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HFCSX Hennessy Focus Fund | -5.05% | 28.30% | 14.67% | 20.99% | -24.92% | 32.04% | 5.47% | 8.00% |
CTIGX Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund | -5.11% | 21.21% | 44.09% | 12.26% | -34.88% | 7.64% | 58.94% | -3.80% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with HFCSX having a -5.05% return and CTIGX slightly lower at -5.11%.
HFCSX
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- -7.76%
- YTD
- -5.05%
- 6M
- 5.52%
- 1Y
- 27.67%
- 3Y*
- 17.42%
- 5Y*
- 8.13%
- 10Y*
- 10.21%
CTIGX
- 1D
- -3.45%
- 1M
- -9.97%
- YTD
- -5.11%
- 6M
- -0.49%
- 1Y
- 31.37%
- 3Y*
- 20.88%
- 5Y*
- 4.28%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
HFCSX vs. CTIGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
HFCSX has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than CTIGX's 1.10% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
HFCSX vs. CTIGX — Risk / Return Rank
HFCSX
CTIGX
HFCSX vs. CTIGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hennessy Focus Fund (HFCSX) and Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund (CTIGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| HFCSX | CTIGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.89 | 1.17 | -0.28 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.43 | 1.68 | -0.26 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.22 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.18 | 2.60 | -1.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.94 | 9.43 | -6.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| HFCSX | CTIGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 | 1.17 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.16 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.38 | +0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between HFCSX and CTIGX is 0.69, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
HFCSX vs. CTIGX - Dividend Comparison
HFCSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 51.04%, more than CTIGX's 4.84% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HFCSX Hennessy Focus Fund | 51.04% | 48.46% | 15.94% | 24.51% | 15.15% | 17.19% | 35.80% | 10.78% | 22.20% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.20% |
CTIGX Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund | 4.84% | 4.59% | 2.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
HFCSX vs. CTIGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HFCSX drawdown since its inception was -59.41%, which is greater than CTIGX's maximum drawdown of -46.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HFCSX and CTIGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| HFCSX | CTIGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.41% | -46.26% | -13.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.90% | -11.56% | -8.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.13% | -46.26% | +13.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.16% | -11.56% | -4.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.86% | -19.06% | +9.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.01% | 3.19% | +4.82% |
Volatility
HFCSX vs. CTIGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hennessy Focus Fund (HFCSX) is 8.95%, while Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund (CTIGX) has a volatility of 11.44%. This indicates that HFCSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTIGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| HFCSX | CTIGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.95% | 11.44% | -2.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.69% | 20.05% | +1.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.39% | 28.24% | +2.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.24% | 26.74% | -4.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.29% | 29.03% | -6.74% |