VRTTX vs. FCNTX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

VRTTX (Vanguard Russell 3000 Index Fund Institutional Shares) and FCNTX (Fidelity Contrafund) are both mutual funds - VRTTX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Vanguard, while FCNTX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, VRTTX returned 14.41%/yr vs 16.85%/yr for FCNTX. Their correlation of 0.93 means they have usually moved in the same direction. VRTTX charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for FCNTX.

Performance

VRTTX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 3000 Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTTX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VRTTX achieves a 9.71% return, which is significantly higher than FCNTX's 5.62% return. Over the past 10 years, VRTTX has underperformed FCNTX with an annualized return of 14.41%, while FCNTX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.85% annualized return.

VRTTX

• 1D: 1.61%
• 1M: -0.79%
• 6M: 8.04%
• YTD: 9.71%
• 1Y: 20.87%
• 3Y*: 18.36%
• 5Y*: 11.55%
• 10Y*: 14.41%
• ALL TIME*: 14.19%

FCNTX

• 1D: 0.95%
• 1M: -3.83%
• 6M: 3.61%
• YTD: 5.62%
• 1Y: 13.75%
• 3Y*: 22.98%
• 5Y*: 13.11%
• 10Y*: 16.85%
• ALL TIME*: 13.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
VRTTX Vanguard Russell 3000 Index Fund Institutional Shares	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

VRTTX vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VRTTX Vanguard Russell 3000 Index Fund Institutional Shares	9.71%	16.70%	23.72%	25.92%	-19.27%	25.48%	20.81%	31.03%	-5.29%	21.02%
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund	5.62%	21.76%	36.00%	38.67%	-28.31%	24.52%	32.48%	30.00%	-3.81%	32.18%

Correlation

The correlation between VRTTX and FCNTX is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.93
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010	0.93

The correlation between VRTTX and FCNTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

VRTTX vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VRTTX

VRTTX Risk / Return Rank: 62
VRTTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
VRTTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
VRTTX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
VRTTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
VRTTX Martin Ratio Rank: 76

FCNTX

FCNTX Risk / Return Rank: 28
FCNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
FCNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
FCNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 26
FCNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
FCNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VRTTX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 3000 Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTTX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VRTTX	FCNTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.41	0.87	+0.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.99	1.29	+0.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.16	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.09	1.19	+0.89
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.03	4.65	+4.38

VRTTX vs. FCNTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VRTTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is higher than the FCNTX Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VRTTX and FCNTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VRTTX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VRTTX drawdown since its inception was -34.96%, smaller than the maximum FCNTX drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRTTX and FCNTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	VRTTX	FCNTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.96%	-49.19%	+14.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.87%	-11.30%	+2.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.56%	-19.75%	+0.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.13%	-32.59%	+7.46%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.96%	-32.59%	-2.37%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.78%	-5.29%	+3.51%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.01%	-8.14%	+4.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.05%	2.89%	-0.84%

Volatility

VRTTX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Russell 3000 Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTTX) is 3.40%, while Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) has a volatility of 3.84%. This indicates that VRTTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VRTTX	FCNTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.40%	3.84%	-0.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.23%	12.26%	-2.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.08%	15.46%	-2.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.47%	19.37%	-1.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.41%	19.73%	-1.32%

VRTTX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VRTTX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

VRTTX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison

VRTTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than FCNTX's 4.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund	4.42%	5.21%	4.19%	3.78%	11.87%	10.80%	8.01%	4.16%	7.46%	6.08%	3.81%	5.33%
VRTTX Vanguard Russell 3000 Index Fund Institutional Shares	1.04%	0.82%	1.20%	1.49%	1.54%	1.12%	1.38%	1.72%	1.96%	1.69%	1.89%	1.91%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VRTTX and FCNTX in my portfolio?

VRTTX and FCNTX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VRTTX or FCNTX?

FCNTX has higher volatility (3.84%) compared to VRTTX (3.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VRTTX dropped -34.96% vs FCNTX's -49.19%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VRTTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.