VRTL vs. LINT

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

VRTL (GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF) and LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.53 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. VRTL charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for LINT.

Performance

VRTL vs. LINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF (VRTL) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VRTL achieves a 49.92% return, which is significantly lower than LINT's 259.95% return.

VRTL

• 1D: 12.49%
• 1M: -40.41%
• 6M: 17.15%
• YTD: 49.92%
• 1Y: 64.41%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 134.30%

LINT

• 1D: -2.72%
• 1M: -47.53%
• 6M: 154.25%
• YTD: 259.95%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	$19.47M	$20.67M	$35.74M
VRTL GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF	$7.19M	$7.02M	$12.49M

VRTL vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
VRTL GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF	49.92%	-9.30%
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	259.95%	5.81%

Correlation

The correlation between VRTL and LINT is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025	0.53

VRTL vs. LINT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VRTL	LINT
Industrials	66.7%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	100.0%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

VRTL vs. LINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VRTL

VRTL Risk / Return Rank: 30
VRTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
VRTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
VRTL Omega Ratio Rank: 40
VRTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
VRTL Martin Ratio Rank: 26

LINT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VRTL vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF (VRTL) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VRTL	LINT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.42	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.50	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.77	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.20	—	—

Drawdowns

VRTL vs. LINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VRTL drawdown since its inception was -70.53%, roughly equal to the maximum LINT drawdown of -69.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRTL and LINT.

Drawdown Indicators

	VRTL	LINT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.53%	-69.02%	-1.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-70.53%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-65.58%	-62.88%	-2.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.14%	-23.85%	+5.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	24.96%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	VRTL	LINT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	52.00%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	106.22%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	128.88%	169.51%	-40.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	130.52%	169.51%	-38.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	130.52%	169.51%	-38.99%

VRTL vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

VRTL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

VRTL vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison

VRTL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%.

Position	TTM	2025
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	0.76%	0.25%
VRTL GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VRTL and LINT in my portfolio?

VRTL and LINT have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, VRTL or LINT?

On fees, LINT is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, VRTL or LINT?

LINT is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for VRTL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VRTL or LINT?

LINT has the higher dividend yield at 0.76%, compared with 0.00% for VRTL.

What is the main difference between VRTL and LINT?

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for VRTL and 0.97% for LINT.