VRTL vs. TSDD
VRTL (GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF) and TSDD (GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VRTL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while TSDD is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, VRTL returned 64.41% vs -46.78% for TSDD. Their -0.41 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. VRTL charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for TSDD.
Performance
VRTL vs. TSDD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VRTL having a 49.92% return and TSDD slightly lower at 47.87%.
VRTL
- 1D
- 12.49%
- 1M
- -40.41%
- 6M
- 17.15%
- YTD
- 49.92%
- 1Y
- 64.41%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 134.30%
TSDD
- 1D
- -1.55%
- 1M
- 44.87%
- 6M
- 39.90%
- YTD
- 47.87%
- 1Y
- -46.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -69.01%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $166.67M | $161.08M | $200.09M | |
| $7.19M | $7.02M | $12.49M |
VRTL vs. TSDD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VRTL GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF | 49.92% | 110.50% |
TSDD GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF | 47.87% | -83.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between VRTL and TSDD is -0.41, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2025 | -0.41 |
VRTL vs. TSDD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VRTL
TSDD
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Industrials
VRTL
TSDD
-
Basic Materials
VRTL
-
TSDD
-
Communication Services
VRTL
-
TSDD
-
Consumer Cyclical
VRTL
-
TSDD
Consumer Defensive
VRTL
-
TSDD
-
Energy
VRTL
-
TSDD
-
Financial Services
VRTL
-
TSDD
-
Healthcare
VRTL
-
TSDD
-
Real Estate
VRTL
-
TSDD
-
Technology
VRTL
-
TSDD
-
Utilities
VRTL
-
TSDD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VRTL vs. TSDD — Risk / Return Rank
VRTL
TSDD
VRTL vs. TSDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF (VRTL) and GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VRTL | TSDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 0.97 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.77 | -0.65 | +1.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.20 | -0.80 | +3.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VRTL vs. TSDD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VRTL drawdown since its inception was -70.53%, smaller than the maximum TSDD drawdown of -99.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRTL and TSDD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VRTL | TSDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.53% | -99.03% | +28.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -70.53% | -69.48% | -1.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -65.58% | -98.31% | +32.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.14% | -72.61% | +54.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.96% | 56.09% | -31.13% |
Volatility
VRTL vs. TSDD - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF (VRTL) has a higher volatility of 52.00% compared to GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSDD) at 37.07%. This indicates that VRTL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VRTL | TSDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 52.00% | 37.07% | +14.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 106.22% | 67.48% | +38.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 128.88% | 92.71% | +36.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 130.52% | 115.20% | +15.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 130.52% | 115.20% | +15.32% |
VRTL vs. TSDD - Expense Ratio Comparison
VRTL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TSDD's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
VRTL vs. TSDD - Dividend Comparison
VRTL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.70%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TSDD GraniteShares 2x Short TSLA Daily ETF | 5.70% | 8.42% | 0.00% | 24.84% |
VRTL GraniteShares 2x Long VRT Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VRTL and TSDD have a correlation of -0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VRTL has higher volatility (52.00%) compared to TSDD (37.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VRTL dropped -70.53% vs TSDD's -99.03%.
On 1-year performance, VRTL leads with 64.41% vs -46.78% for TSDD. On fees, TSDD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, TSDD has been the lower-risk option at 37.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, VRTL has performed better with a 64.41% return vs -46.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSDD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for VRTL.
TSDD has the higher dividend yield at 5.70%, compared with 0.00% for VRTL.
VRTL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TSDD is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for VRTL and 0.95% for TSDD.
VRTL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.42 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VRTL and TSDD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer