VRT vs. MU

Last updated Jun 20, 2026

VRT (Vertiv Holdings Co.) and MU (Micron Technology, Inc.) are both stocks. VRT operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials), while MU operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 5 years, VRT returned 66.54%/yr vs 72.13%/yr for MU. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

VRT vs. MU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VRT achieves a 105.66% return, which is significantly lower than MU's 297.49% return.

VRT

• 1D: 4.87%
• 1M: 1.73%
• YTD: 105.66%
• 6M: 108.48%
• 1Y: 181.27%
• 3Y*: 145.68%
• 5Y*: 66.54%
• 10Y*: —

MU

• 1D: 8.70%
• 1M: 51.00%
• YTD: 297.49%
• 6M: 326.79%
• 1Y: 819.66%
• 3Y*: 157.01%
• 5Y*: 72.13%
• 10Y*: 57.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VRT vs. MU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co.	105.66%	42.80%	136.82%	251.81%	-45.25%	33.80%	69.36%	12.55%	1.03%
MU Micron Technology, Inc.	297.49%	240.24%	-0.96%	71.93%	-45.93%	24.21%	39.79%	69.49%	-41.20%

Correlation

The correlation between VRT and MU is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.51
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2018	0.42

The correlation between VRT and MU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.42 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap VRT : $130.60B MU : $1.29T
EPS VRT : $3.99 MU : $21.26
PE Ratio VRT : 83.56 MU : 53.35
PEG Ratio VRT : 0.37 MU : 0.20
PS Ratio VRT : 12.01 MU : 22.13
PB Ratio VRT : 30.77 MU : 17.84
Total Revenue (TTM) VRT : $10.84B MU : $58.12B
Gross Profit (TTM) VRT : $3.92B MU : $33.96B
EBITDA (TTM) VRT : $2.35B MU : $25.99B

Return for Risk

VRT vs. MU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VRT

VRT Risk / Return Rank: 94
VRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
VRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
VRT Omega Ratio Rank: 91
VRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
VRT Martin Ratio Rank: 95

MU

MU Risk / Return Rank: 99
MU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MU Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
MU Omega Ratio Rank: 98
MU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MU Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VRT vs. MU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VRT	MU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.09	11.84	-8.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.50	6.34	-2.84
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.80	-0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.16	27.79	-20.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.97	105.40	-86.43

VRT vs. MU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VRT Sharpe Ratio is 3.09, which is lower than the MU Sharpe Ratio of 11.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VRT and MU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VRT vs. MU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VRT drawdown since its inception was -71.24%, smaller than the maximum MU drawdown of -98.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRT and MU.

Drawdown Indicators

	VRT	MU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.24%	-98.25%	+27.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.32%	-30.28%	+4.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-61.28%	-57.63%	-3.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-71.24%	-57.63%	-13.61%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-57.63%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.46%	0.00%	-11.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.23%	-58.14%	+41.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.53%	7.97%	+1.56%

Volatility

VRT vs. MU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) is 15.84%, while Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a volatility of 33.27%. This indicates that VRT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VRT	MU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.84%	33.27%	-17.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	45.28%	58.61%	-13.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	58.58%	71.09%	-12.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	62.01%	53.57%	+8.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	54.65%	50.34%	+4.31%

Dividends

VRT vs. MU - Dividend Comparison

VRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, more than MU's 0.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
MU Micron Technology, Inc.	0.04%	0.16%	0.55%	0.54%	0.89%	0.21%	0.00%
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co.	0.07%	0.11%	0.10%	0.05%	0.07%	0.04%	0.05%

Financials

VRT vs. MU - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Vertiv Holdings Co. and Micron Technology, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

VRT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a gross profit of 999.70M and revenue of 2.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.7%.

MU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 17.75B and revenue of 23.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.4%.

VRT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported an operating income of 440.10M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.6%.

MU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 16.13B and revenue of 23.86B, resulting in an operating margin of 67.6%.

VRT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a net income of 390.10M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in a net margin of 14.7%.

MU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 13.79B and revenue of 23.86B, resulting in a net margin of 57.8%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VRT and MU in my portfolio?

VRT and MU have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VRT or MU?

MU has higher volatility (33.27%) compared to VRT (15.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VRT dropped -71.24% vs MU's -98.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.84 vs 3.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.