VRT vs. AGI.TO
VRT (Vertiv Holdings Co.) and AGI.TO (Alamos Gold Inc.) are both stocks. VRT operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials), while AGI.TO operates in Gold (Basic Materials). Over the past 5 years, VRT returned 63.29%/yr vs 32.82%/yr for AGI.TO. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
VRT vs. AGI.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
VRT is traded in USD, while AGI.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the AGI.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VRT achieves a 86.99% return, which is significantly higher than AGI.TO's -8.85% return.
VRT
- 1D
- 1.68%
- 1M
- -19.50%
- YTD
- 86.99%
- 6M
- 87.85%
- 1Y
- 173.26%
- 3Y*
- 138.33%
- 5Y*
- 63.29%
- 10Y*
- —
AGI.TO
- 1D
- 2.02%
- 1M
- -18.99%
- YTD
- -8.85%
- 6M
- -8.29%
- 1Y
- 28.36%
- 3Y*
- 42.62%
- 5Y*
- 32.82%
- 10Y*
- 17.19%
VRT vs. AGI.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co. | 86.99% | 42.80% | 136.82% | 251.81% | -45.25% | 33.80% | 69.36% | 12.55% | 1.03% |
AGI.TO Alamos Gold Inc. | -8.85% | 110.12% | 38.03% | 34.44% | 33.88% | -11.57% | 46.88% | 67.22% | -35.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between VRT and AGI.TO is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2018 | 0.07 |
The correlation between VRT and AGI.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (all time) to 0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
VRT:
$118.76B
AGI.TO:
CA$20.75B
VRT:
$3.99
AGI.TO:
$2.52
VRT:
75.98
AGI.TO:
13.99
VRT:
0.33
AGI.TO:
0.09
VRT:
10.92
AGI.TO:
7.19
VRT:
27.98
AGI.TO:
3.22
VRT:
$10.84B
AGI.TO:
$2.07B
VRT:
$3.92B
AGI.TO:
$1.22B
VRT:
$2.35B
AGI.TO:
$1.43B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VRT vs. AGI.TO — Risk / Return Rank
VRT
AGI.TO
VRT vs. AGI.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) and Alamos Gold Inc. (AGI.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VRT | AGI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.14 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.55 | 0.72 | +5.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.79 | 2.06 | +15.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VRT vs. AGI.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VRT drawdown since its inception was -71.24%, smaller than the maximum AGI.TO drawdown of -88.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRT and AGI.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VRT | AGI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.24% | -88.23% | +16.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.32% | -40.44% | +15.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -61.28% | -40.44% | -20.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -71.24% | -40.44% | -30.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -71.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.50% | -36.26% | +16.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.23% | -40.82% | +24.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.30% | 14.06% | -4.76% |
Volatility
VRT vs. AGI.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) is 16.12%, while Alamos Gold Inc. (AGI.TO) has a volatility of 17.53%. This indicates that VRT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGI.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VRT | AGI.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.12% | 17.53% | -1.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.82% | 41.70% | +4.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.29% | 50.53% | +7.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.88% | 39.75% | +22.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.61% | 47.07% | +7.54% |
Dividends
VRT vs. AGI.TO - Dividend Comparison
VRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, less than AGI.TO's 0.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGI.TO Alamos Gold Inc. | 0.37% | 0.26% | 0.52% | 0.76% | 0.91% | 1.03% | 0.79% | 0.51% | 0.41% | 0.29% | 0.22% | 0.88% |
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co. | 0.07% | 0.11% | 0.10% | 0.05% | 0.07% | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
VRT vs. AGI.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Vertiv Holdings Co. and Alamos Gold Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
VRT vs. AGI.TO - Profitability Comparison
VRT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a gross profit of 999.70M and revenue of 2.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.7%.
AGI.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alamos Gold Inc. reported a gross profit of 375.05M and revenue of 586.92M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.9%.
VRT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported an operating income of 440.10M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.6%.
AGI.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alamos Gold Inc. reported an operating income of 336.79M and revenue of 586.92M, resulting in an operating margin of 57.4%.
VRT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a net income of 390.10M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in a net margin of 14.7%.
AGI.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Alamos Gold Inc. reported a net income of 188.26M and revenue of 586.92M, resulting in a net margin of 32.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
VRT and AGI.TO have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for VRT and AGI.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer