AGI.TO vs. PNP.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Alamos Gold Inc. (AGI.TO) and Pinetree Capital Ltd. (PNP.TO).
Performance
AGI.TO vs. PNP.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AGI.TO vs. PNP.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGI.TO Alamos Gold Inc. | 16.87% | 100.53% | 49.72% | 31.23% | 42.46% | -11.39% | 43.39% | 60.59% | -39.82% | -11.33% |
PNP.TO Pinetree Capital Ltd. | -24.25% | 0.45% | 205.56% | -9.77% | -26.79% | 79.28% | -1.30% | 22.22% | -51.54% | 16.59% |
Fundamentals
AGI.TO:
CA$26.13B
PNP.TO:
CA$78.57M
AGI.TO:
CA$2.10
PNP.TO:
CA$1.05
AGI.TO:
29.41
PNP.TO:
7.95
AGI.TO:
0.18
PNP.TO:
0.04
AGI.TO:
14.43
PNP.TO:
4.60
AGI.TO:
5.89
PNP.TO:
0.90
AGI.TO:
CA$1.81B
PNP.TO:
CA$17.09M
AGI.TO:
CA$984.43M
PNP.TO:
CA$17.05M
AGI.TO:
CA$1.19B
PNP.TO:
CA$10.52M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AGI.TO achieves a 16.87% return, which is significantly higher than PNP.TO's -24.25% return. Over the past 10 years, AGI.TO has outperformed PNP.TO with an annualized return of 24.78%, while PNP.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 3.38% annualized return.
AGI.TO
- 1D
- 6.32%
- 1M
- -16.22%
- YTD
- 16.87%
- 6M
- 27.77%
- 1Y
- 61.48%
- 3Y*
- 56.21%
- 5Y*
- 44.49%
- 10Y*
- 24.78%
PNP.TO
- 1D
- -1.53%
- 1M
- -16.30%
- YTD
- -24.25%
- 6M
- -32.83%
- 1Y
- -44.20%
- 3Y*
- 32.72%
- 5Y*
- 13.72%
- 10Y*
- 3.38%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AGI.TO vs. PNP.TO — Risk / Return Rank
AGI.TO
PNP.TO
AGI.TO vs. PNP.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alamos Gold Inc. (AGI.TO) and Pinetree Capital Ltd. (PNP.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AGI.TO | PNP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.24 | -0.87 | +2.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.70 | -1.29 | +3.00 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 0.86 | +0.37 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.08 | -0.65 | +2.74 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.50 | -0.98 | +6.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AGI.TO | PNP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.24 | -0.87 | +2.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.16 | 0.27 | +0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.05 | +0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | — | — |
Correlation
The correlation between AGI.TO and PNP.TO is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
AGI.TO vs. PNP.TO - Dividend Comparison
AGI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, while PNP.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGI.TO Alamos Gold Inc. | 0.26% | 0.26% | 0.52% | 0.76% | 0.96% | 1.28% | 0.78% | 0.66% | 0.53% | 0.31% | 0.28% | 1.08% |
PNP.TO Pinetree Capital Ltd. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
AGI.TO vs. PNP.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AGI.TO drawdown since its inception was -81.87%, smaller than the maximum PNP.TO drawdown of -102.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AGI.TO and PNP.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AGI.TO | PNP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.87% | -102.37% | +20.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.28% | -62.93% | +32.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.28% | -62.93% | +32.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.53% | -83.00% | +12.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.12% | -100.01% | +81.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.70% | -96.22% | +64.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.47% | 41.80% | -30.33% |
Volatility
AGI.TO vs. PNP.TO - Volatility Comparison
Alamos Gold Inc. (AGI.TO) has a higher volatility of 17.96% compared to Pinetree Capital Ltd. (PNP.TO) at 9.71%. This indicates that AGI.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PNP.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AGI.TO | PNP.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.96% | 9.71% | +8.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.66% | 30.89% | +9.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.74% | 51.16% | -1.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.64% | 52.09% | -13.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.32% | 71.63% | -24.31% |
Financials
AGI.TO vs. PNP.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Alamos Gold Inc. and Pinetree Capital Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AGI.TO vs. PNP.TO - Profitability Comparison
AGI.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Alamos Gold Inc. reported a gross profit of 351.22M and revenue of 584.14M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.1%.
PNP.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Pinetree Capital Ltd. reported a gross profit of 2.66M and revenue of 2.68M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 99.5%.
AGI.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Alamos Gold Inc. reported an operating income of 333.35M and revenue of 584.14M, resulting in an operating margin of 57.1%.
PNP.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Pinetree Capital Ltd. reported an operating income of -757.00K and revenue of 2.68M, resulting in an operating margin of -28.3%.
AGI.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Alamos Gold Inc. reported a net income of 441.58M and revenue of 584.14M, resulting in a net margin of 75.6%.
PNP.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Pinetree Capital Ltd. reported a net income of -1.09M and revenue of 2.68M, resulting in a net margin of -40.7%.