PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VRSAX vs. JRLVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VRSAX vs. JRLVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Voya Target Retirement 2060 Fund (VRSAX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VRSAX achieves a 13.55% return, which is significantly higher than JRLVX's 12.32% return. Over the past 10 years, VRSAX has outperformed JRLVX with an annualized return of 12.16%, while JRLVX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.36% annualized return.


VRSAX

1D
0.43%
1M
5.93%
YTD
13.55%
6M
14.40%
1Y
30.28%
3Y*
20.43%
5Y*
10.71%
10Y*
12.16%

JRLVX

1D
0.44%
1M
5.08%
YTD
12.32%
6M
13.05%
1Y
27.67%
3Y*
18.90%
5Y*
9.59%
10Y*
11.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VRSAX vs. JRLVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VRSAX
Voya Target Retirement 2060 Fund
13.55%20.81%15.53%20.65%-18.89%19.32%17.84%25.19%-9.34%21.16%
JRLVX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio
12.32%19.25%14.50%18.00%-18.06%18.45%16.23%25.03%-8.29%17.40%

Correlation

The correlation between VRSAX and JRLVX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.97

The correlation between VRSAX and JRLVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VRSAX vs. JRLVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VRSAX
VRSAX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
VRSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VRSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

JRLVX
JRLVX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
JRLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JRLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
JRLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
JRLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
JRLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VRSAX vs. JRLVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Target Retirement 2060 Fund (VRSAX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VRSAXJRLVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.46

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.53

3.31

+0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.08

14.68

+2.40

VRSAX vs. JRLVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VRSAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is comparable to the JRLVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VRSAX and JRLVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VRSAXJRLVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.73

2.50

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.65

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

0.71

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.65

+0.10

Drawdowns

VRSAX vs. JRLVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VRSAX drawdown since its inception was -33.47%, roughly equal to the maximum JRLVX drawdown of -32.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRSAX and JRLVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VRSAXJRLVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.47%

-32.53%

-0.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.58%

-8.50%

-1.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.08%

-15.27%

-0.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.33%

-25.64%

-0.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.47%

-32.53%

-0.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.90%

-4.56%

-0.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

1.91%

0.00%

Volatility

VRSAX vs. JRLVX - Volatility Comparison

Voya Target Retirement 2060 Fund (VRSAX) has a higher volatility of 3.70% compared to John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX) at 3.34%. This indicates that VRSAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JRLVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VRSAXJRLVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.70%

3.34%

+0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.16%

8.96%

+1.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.42%

11.27%

+1.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.54%

14.77%

+0.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.39%

15.99%

+0.40%

VRSAX vs. JRLVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VRSAX has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is higher than JRLVX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VRSAX vs. JRLVX - Dividend Comparison

VRSAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.15%, more than JRLVX's 3.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JRLVX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio
3.16%3.55%1.89%2.24%8.03%6.00%4.26%8.99%10.96%4.29%3.40%1.90%
VRSAX
Voya Target Retirement 2060 Fund
13.15%14.93%1.88%1.86%7.73%21.57%2.26%5.70%9.82%6.15%1.57%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VRSAX and JRLVX have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VRSAX has higher volatility (3.70%) compared to JRLVX (3.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VRSAX dropped -33.47% vs JRLVX's -32.53%.

VRSAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 2.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VRSAX and JRLVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer