VRIG vs. LVHI
VRIG (Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF) and LVHI (Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VRIG is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Invesco, while LVHI is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR. VRIG is actively managed, while LVHI is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VRIG returned 4.44%/yr vs 15.97%/yr for LVHI. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VRIG charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for LVHI.
Performance
VRIG vs. LVHI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VRIG achieves a 1.91% return, which is significantly lower than LVHI's 13.78% return.
VRIG
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.91%
- 6M
- 2.18%
- 1Y
- 4.85%
- 3Y*
- 5.94%
- 5Y*
- 4.44%
- 10Y*
- —
LVHI
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 0.84%
- YTD
- 13.78%
- 6M
- 14.96%
- 1Y
- 32.13%
- 3Y*
- 21.52%
- 5Y*
- 15.97%
- 10Y*
- —
VRIG vs. LVHI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VRIG Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF | 1.91% | 5.05% | 6.81% | 7.37% | 0.99% | 1.06% | 1.76% | 4.57% | 0.51% | 3.20% |
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 13.78% | 27.12% | 14.81% | 17.45% | 3.84% | 18.19% | -8.76% | 18.35% | -5.22% | 12.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between VRIG and LVHI is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2016 | 0.11 |
The correlation between VRIG and LVHI shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.13 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VRIG vs. LVHI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VRIG
LVHI
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Real Estate
Utilities
Industrials
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
VRIG
LVHI
Consumer Cyclical
VRIG
LVHI
Basic Materials
VRIG
LVHI
Consumer Defensive
VRIG
LVHI
Technology
VRIG
LVHI
Real Estate
VRIG
LVHI
Utilities
VRIG
LVHI
Industrials
VRIG
LVHI
Communication Services
VRIG
-
LVHI
Energy
VRIG
-
LVHI
Healthcare
VRIG
-
LVHI
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VRIG vs. LVHI — Risk / Return Rank
VRIG
LVHI
VRIG vs. LVHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF (VRIG) and Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VRIG | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +6.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +19.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 5.25 | 1.63 | +3.62 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 61.96 | 5.23 | +56.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 315.58 | 21.61 | +293.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VRIG vs. LVHI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VRIG drawdown since its inception was -13.04%, smaller than the maximum LVHI drawdown of -32.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRIG and LVHI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VRIG | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.04% | -32.31% | +19.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.08% | -6.08% | +6.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.78% | -11.99% | +11.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -2.28% | -11.99% | +9.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.27% | -3.51% | +3.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.02% | 1.48% | -1.46% |
Volatility
VRIG vs. LVHI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF (VRIG) is 0.10%, while Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) has a volatility of 2.78%. This indicates that VRIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LVHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VRIG | LVHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.10% | 2.78% | -2.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.35% | 7.72% | -7.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50% | 9.60% | -9.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.29% | 11.08% | -9.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.79% | 13.75% | -9.96% |
VRIG vs. LVHI - Expense Ratio Comparison
VRIG has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than LVHI's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
VRIG vs. LVHI - Dividend Comparison
VRIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%, more than LVHI's 4.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 4.69% | 4.92% | 3.98% | 8.12% | 7.74% | 4.13% | 3.97% | 6.67% | 10.67% | 3.38% | 2.02% |
VRIG Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF | 4.79% | 4.99% | 6.09% | 5.97% | 2.39% | 0.78% | 1.57% | 3.12% | 2.89% | 2.31% | 0.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VRIG and LVHI have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LVHI has higher volatility (2.78%) compared to VRIG (0.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VRIG dropped -13.04% vs LVHI's -32.31%.
On 5-year performance, LVHI leads with 15.97% vs 4.44% for VRIG. On fees, VRIG is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, VRIG has been the lower-risk option at 0.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, LVHI has performed better with a 15.97% return vs 4.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VRIG is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for LVHI.
VRIG has the higher dividend yield at 4.79%, compared with 4.69% for LVHI.
VRIG is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while LVHI is Volatility Hedged Equity. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for VRIG and 0.40% for LVHI.
VRIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.00 vs 3.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VRIG and LVHI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer