VRIG vs. EMLP
VRIG (Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF) and EMLP (First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - VRIG is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Invesco, while EMLP is a MLPs fund actively managed by First Trust. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, VRIG returned 4.44%/yr vs 15.13%/yr for EMLP. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VRIG charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for EMLP.
Performance
VRIG vs. EMLP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VRIG achieves a 1.91% return, which is significantly lower than EMLP's 15.76% return.
VRIG
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.91%
- 6M
- 2.18%
- 1Y
- 4.85%
- 3Y*
- 5.94%
- 5Y*
- 4.44%
- 10Y*
- —
EMLP
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- -1.31%
- YTD
- 15.76%
- 6M
- 15.73%
- 1Y
- 19.70%
- 3Y*
- 21.55%
- 5Y*
- 15.13%
- 10Y*
- 10.37%
VRIG vs. EMLP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VRIG Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF | 1.91% | 5.05% | 6.81% | 7.37% | 0.99% | 1.06% | 1.76% | 4.57% | 0.51% | 3.20% |
EMLP First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 15.76% | 9.67% | 33.39% | 8.05% | 10.39% | 23.20% | -13.36% | 23.40% | -8.70% | 1.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between VRIG and EMLP is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2016 | 0.08 |
The correlation between VRIG and EMLP shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.10 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VRIG vs. EMLP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VRIG
EMLP
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
Industrials
Communication Services
-
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Financial Services
VRIG
EMLP
-
Consumer Cyclical
VRIG
EMLP
-
Basic Materials
VRIG
EMLP
Consumer Defensive
VRIG
EMLP
-
Technology
VRIG
EMLP
-
Real Estate
VRIG
EMLP
-
Utilities
VRIG
EMLP
Industrials
VRIG
EMLP
Communication Services
VRIG
-
EMLP
-
Energy
VRIG
-
EMLP
Healthcare
VRIG
-
EMLP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VRIG vs. EMLP — Risk / Return Rank
VRIG
EMLP
VRIG vs. EMLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF (VRIG) and First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund (EMLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VRIG | EMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +7.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +21.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 5.25 | 1.34 | +3.91 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 61.96 | 4.03 | +57.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 315.58 | 12.36 | +303.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VRIG vs. EMLP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VRIG drawdown since its inception was -13.04%, smaller than the maximum EMLP drawdown of -43.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRIG and EMLP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VRIG | EMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.04% | -43.61% | +30.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.08% | -4.94% | +4.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.78% | -11.47% | +10.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -2.28% | -14.59% | +12.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.66% | +2.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.27% | -5.75% | +5.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.02% | 1.61% | -1.59% |
Volatility
VRIG vs. EMLP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF (VRIG) is 0.10%, while First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund (EMLP) has a volatility of 3.79%. This indicates that VRIG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VRIG | EMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.10% | 3.79% | -3.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.35% | 7.86% | -7.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50% | 9.87% | -9.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.29% | 14.53% | -13.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.79% | 17.69% | -13.90% |
VRIG vs. EMLP - Expense Ratio Comparison
VRIG has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than EMLP's 0.96% expense ratio.
Dividends
VRIG vs. EMLP - Dividend Comparison
VRIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%, more than EMLP's 2.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMLP First Trust North American Energy Infrastructure Fund | 2.76% | 3.18% | 3.19% | 3.92% | 3.15% | 3.29% | 4.70% | 3.71% | 4.71% | 3.80% | 3.62% | 4.63% |
VRIG Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF | 4.79% | 4.99% | 6.09% | 5.97% | 2.39% | 0.78% | 1.57% | 3.12% | 2.89% | 2.31% | 0.60% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VRIG and EMLP have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMLP has higher volatility (3.79%) compared to VRIG (0.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VRIG dropped -13.04% vs EMLP's -43.61%.
On 5-year performance, EMLP leads with 15.13% vs 4.44% for VRIG. On fees, VRIG is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, VRIG has been the lower-risk option at 0.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EMLP has performed better with a 15.13% return vs 4.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VRIG is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for EMLP.
VRIG has the higher dividend yield at 4.79%, compared with 2.76% for EMLP.
VRIG is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while EMLP is MLPs. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for VRIG and 0.96% for EMLP.
VRIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.00 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VRIG and EMLP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer