VPX vs. BDGS

Last updated Jul 10, 2026

VPX (Variant Perception Cycle Aware US Equity ETF) and BDGS (Bridges Capital Tactical ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VPX charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for BDGS.

Performance

VPX vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Variant Perception Cycle Aware US Equity ETF (VPX) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

VPX

• 1D: 0.76%
• 1M: 4.37%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BDGS

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 1.17%
• 6M: 5.58%
• YTD: 5.78%
• 1Y: 11.86%
• 3Y*: 13.94%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VPX vs. BDGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
VPX Variant Perception Cycle Aware US Equity ETF	20.65%
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	5.17%

Correlation

The correlation between VPX and BDGS is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2026	0.71

Return for Risk

VPX vs. BDGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VPX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BDGS

BDGS Risk / Return Rank: 78
BDGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
BDGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
BDGS Omega Ratio Rank: 81
BDGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
BDGS Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VPX vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Variant Perception Cycle Aware US Equity ETF (VPX) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VPX	BDGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.88	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.81	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.38	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.95	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	12.07	—

Drawdowns

VPX vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VPX drawdown since its inception was -5.91%, smaller than the maximum BDGS drawdown of -9.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VPX and BDGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	VPX	BDGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.91%	-9.12%	+3.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-4.03%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-9.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.69%	+0.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.90%	-0.67%	-0.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.98%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	VPX	BDGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.40%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	5.28%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.44%	6.35%	+10.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.44%	8.19%	+8.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.44%	8.19%	+8.25%

VPX vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

VPX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.87% expense ratio.

Dividends

VPX vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

VPX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BDGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF	0.52%	0.55%	1.81%	0.84%
VPX Variant Perception Cycle Aware US Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VPX and BDGS in my portfolio?

VPX and BDGS have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, VPX or BDGS?

On fees, VPX is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, VPX or BDGS?

VPX is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for BDGS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VPX or BDGS?

BDGS has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.00% for VPX.

What is the main difference between VPX and BDGS?

They also come from different issuers: Variant Perception and Bridges. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for VPX and 0.87% for BDGS.