PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VPX vs. CNAV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VPX vs. CNAV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Variant Perception Cycle Aware US Equity ETF (VPX) and Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


VPX

1D
-1.52%
1M
-0.60%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

CNAV

1D
-3.98%
1M
-23.22%
6M
8.11%
YTD
15.70%
1Y
27.09%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
21.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$291.23K$389.86K$340.83K
$182.48K$205.20K$111.23K

VPX vs. CNAV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between VPX and CNAV is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2026

0.78

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VPX vs. CNAV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VPX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


CNAV
CNAV Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
CNAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNAV Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
CNAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNAV Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VPX vs. CNAV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Variant Perception Cycle Aware US Equity ETF (VPX) and Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VPXCNAVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.94

VPX vs. CNAV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VPX vs. CNAV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VPX drawdown since its inception was -5.91%, smaller than the maximum CNAV drawdown of -30.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VPX and CNAV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VPXCNAVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.91%

-30.06%

+24.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.39%

-25.80%

+23.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.87%

-5.78%

+4.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.49%

Volatility

VPX vs. CNAV - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VPXCNAVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.79%

33.61%

-17.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.79%

31.10%

-15.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.79%

31.10%

-15.31%

VPX vs. CNAV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VPX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than CNAV's 1.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

VPX vs. CNAV - Dividend Comparison

Neither VPX nor CNAV has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


VPX and CNAV have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VPX is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VPX is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for CNAV.

VPX and CNAV have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Variant Perception and Mohr. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for VPX and 1.31% for CNAV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VPX and CNAV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer