PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VPU vs. VT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VPU vs. VT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Utilities ETF (VPU) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VPU achieves a 8.52% return, which is significantly lower than VT's 10.43% return. Over the past 10 years, VPU has underperformed VT with an annualized return of 9.30%, while VT has yielded a comparatively higher 13.25% annualized return.


VPU

1D
0.66%
1M
1.44%
YTD
8.52%
6M
8.11%
1Y
16.97%
3Y*
15.09%
5Y*
10.47%
10Y*
9.30%

VT

1D
0.38%
1M
-1.25%
YTD
10.43%
6M
9.42%
1Y
24.79%
3Y*
20.08%
5Y*
10.49%
10Y*
13.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VPU vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VPU
Vanguard Utilities ETF
8.52%16.46%23.04%-7.45%1.06%17.40%-0.74%24.89%4.38%12.44%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
10.43%22.43%16.49%22.02%-18.00%18.27%16.59%26.81%-9.76%24.50%

Correlation

The correlation between VPU and VT is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2008

0.48

Over the past year, the correlation between VPU and VT has dropped to 0.24 - well below their long-term average of 0.48, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VPU vs. VT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VPU
VT

Utilities

99.3%
2.4%

Energy

0.5%
3.8%

Industrials

0.2%
11.4%

Basic Materials

-

4.1%

Communication Services

-

8.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.3%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.5%

Financial Services

-

15.2%

Healthcare

-

7.9%

Real Estate

-

2.3%

Technology

-

31.1%

Utilities

VPU
99.3%
VT
2.4%

Energy

VPU
0.5%
VT
3.8%

Industrials

VPU
0.2%
VT
11.4%

Basic Materials

VPU

-

VT
4.1%

Communication Services

VPU

-

VT
8.0%

Consumer Cyclical

VPU

-

VT
9.3%

Consumer Defensive

VPU

-

VT
4.5%

Financial Services

VPU

-

VT
15.2%

Healthcare

VPU

-

VT
7.9%

Real Estate

VPU

-

VT
2.3%

Technology

VPU

-

VT
31.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VPU vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VPU
VPU Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
VPU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VPU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
VPU Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
VPU Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
VPU Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

VT
VT Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VPU vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Utilities ETF (VPU) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VPUVTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.34

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

2.57

-0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.07

11.09

-7.02

VPU vs. VT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VPU Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is lower than the VT Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VPU and VT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VPU vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VPU drawdown since its inception was -46.31%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VPU and VT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VPUVTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.31%

-50.27%

+3.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-9.67%

+0.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.34%

-16.51%

-0.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.15%

-26.38%

+1.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.42%

-34.24%

-2.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.46%

-2.47%

+0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.78%

-7.00%

-0.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.18%

2.24%

+1.94%

Volatility

VPU vs. VT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Utilities ETF (VPU) is 5.22%, while Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) has a volatility of 5.53%. This indicates that VPU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VPUVTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.22%

5.53%

-0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.47%

11.28%

+0.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.42%

13.51%

+0.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.03%

16.19%

+0.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.14%

17.19%

+1.95%

VPU vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison

VPU has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VPU vs. VT - Dividend Comparison

VPU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, more than VT's 1.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VPU
Vanguard Utilities ETF
3.23%2.73%3.02%3.49%2.98%2.70%3.17%2.83%3.23%3.18%3.19%3.63%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
1.60%1.82%1.95%2.08%2.20%1.82%1.66%2.32%2.53%2.11%2.39%2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


VPU and VT have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VT has higher volatility (5.53%) compared to VPU (5.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VPU dropped -46.31% vs VT's -50.27%.

On 10-year performance, VT leads with 13.25% vs 9.30% for VPU. On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VPU has been the lower-risk option at 5.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VT has performed better with a 13.25% return vs 9.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VPU.

VPU has the higher dividend yield at 3.23%, compared with 1.60% for VT.

VPU is categorized as Utilities Equities, while VT is Global Equities. VPU tracks MSCI US Investable Market Utilities 25/50 Index, while VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VPU and 0.06% for VT.

VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VPU and VT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer