PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VPG vs. AMAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

VPG vs. AMAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vishay Precision Group, Inc. (VPG) and Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VPG achieves a 237.48% return, which is significantly higher than AMAT's 95.35% return. Over the past 10 years, VPG has underperformed AMAT with an annualized return of 25.62%, while AMAT has yielded a comparatively higher 36.77% annualized return.


VPG

1D
-2.26%
1M
116.44%
YTD
237.48%
6M
253.74%
1Y
398.77%
3Y*
53.78%
5Y*
30.20%
10Y*
25.62%

AMAT

1D
2.19%
1M
28.11%
YTD
95.35%
6M
86.88%
1Y
211.89%
3Y*
56.21%
5Y*
30.15%
10Y*
36.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VPG vs. AMAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VPG
Vishay Precision Group, Inc.
237.48%64.04%-31.11%-11.85%4.12%17.92%-7.41%12.47%20.20%33.07%
AMAT
Applied Materials, Inc.
95.35%59.60%1.13%67.97%-37.54%83.64%43.29%89.86%-34.92%59.86%

Correlation

The correlation between VPG and AMAT is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2010

0.38

Fundamentals

Market Cap

VPG:

$1.73B

AMAT:

$400.12B

EPS

VPG:

$0.44

AMAT:

$10.61

PE Ratio

VPG:

292.26

AMAT:

47.19

PS Ratio

VPG:

5.41

AMAT:

13.83

PB Ratio

VPG:

5.16

AMAT:

16.73

Total Revenue (TTM)

VPG:

$319.82M

AMAT:

$29.02B

Gross Profit (TTM)

VPG:

$125.26M

AMAT:

$14.21B

EBITDA (TTM)

VPG:

$23.27M

AMAT:

$9.92B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VPG vs. AMAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VPG
VPG Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
VPG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VPG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
VPG Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
VPG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
VPG Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

AMAT
AMAT Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
AMAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMAT Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
AMAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMAT Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VPG vs. AMAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vishay Precision Group, Inc. (VPG) and Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VPGAMATDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.72

1.59

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

14.67

9.98

+4.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

40.27

28.53

+11.73

VPG vs. AMAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VPG Sharpe Ratio is 6.37, which is higher than the AMAT Sharpe Ratio of 4.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VPG and AMAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VPGAMATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.37

4.63

+1.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.70

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.87

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.43

-0.02

Drawdowns

VPG vs. AMAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VPG drawdown since its inception was -60.04%, smaller than the maximum AMAT drawdown of -85.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VPG and AMAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VPGAMATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.04%

-85.22%

+25.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.40%

-21.37%

-6.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.86%

-49.88%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.69%

-55.14%

-2.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.04%

-55.14%

-4.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.26%

0.00%

-2.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.22%

-38.81%

+14.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.96%

7.46%

+2.50%

Volatility

VPG vs. AMAT - Volatility Comparison

Vishay Precision Group, Inc. (VPG) has a higher volatility of 32.36% compared to Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) at 15.12%. This indicates that VPG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VPGAMATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

32.36%

15.12%

+17.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.66%

35.27%

+15.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

63.21%

46.10%

+17.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.74%

43.57%

+1.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.60%

42.61%

-1.01%

Dividends

VPG vs. AMAT - Dividend Comparison

VPG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMAT
Applied Materials, Inc.
0.38%0.69%0.93%0.75%1.05%0.60%1.01%1.36%2.14%0.78%1.24%2.14%
VPG
Vishay Precision Group, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

VPG vs. AMAT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Vishay Precision Group, Inc. and Applied Materials, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B20222023202420252026
84.35M
7.91B
(VPG) Total Revenue
(AMAT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

VPG vs. AMAT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Vishay Precision Group, Inc. and Applied Materials, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

36.0%38.0%40.0%42.0%44.0%46.0%48.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
39.0%
49.9%
Portfolio components
VPG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vishay Precision Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 32.87M and revenue of 84.35M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.0%.

AMAT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Applied Materials, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.95B and revenue of 7.91B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.9%.

VPG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vishay Precision Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 340.00K and revenue of 84.35M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.4%.

AMAT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Applied Materials, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.52B and revenue of 7.91B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.9%.

VPG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vishay Precision Group, Inc. reported a net income of -319.00K and revenue of 84.35M, resulting in a net margin of -0.4%.

AMAT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Applied Materials, Inc. reported a net income of 2.81B and revenue of 7.91B, resulting in a net margin of 35.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


VPG and AMAT have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VPG has higher volatility (32.36%) compared to AMAT (15.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VPG dropped -60.04% vs AMAT's -85.22%.

VPG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.37 vs 4.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VPG and AMAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer